ArticleERJ open research2025
Severe Paediatric Asthma Collaborative in Europe: real-world data on children on biologics.
Article in ERJ open research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Therapeutic Switching of Biological Drugs in Paediatric Severe Asthma: Experience of a Referral Centre.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Update on biologic and small molecules treatments in pediatric allergic diseases.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2026Review
- Review
- Do biologics improve health outcomes in children with severe asthma? A cohort study.ERJ open research · 2026Article
- Biologic therapies for severe pediatric asthma: efficacy, safety, and biomarker-guided selection.Frontiers in allergy · 2026Review
- Mepolizumab in Pediatric Severe Eosinophilic Asthma: A Review of Efficacy, Safety, and Clinical Applications.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Review
- Biologic Therapies and Quality of Life in Pediatric Patients with Asthma: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Assessing the Value of Omalizumab for Pediatric Asthma in China: A Multicriteria Decision Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Real-world evidence on biologic use in paediatric asthma: there but not there yet?ERJ open research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
35 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Real-world data on children with severe asthma is scarce. We report characteristics of children with severe asthma already on biologics, enrolled in the Severe Paediatric Asthma Collaborative in Europe, a clinical research collaboration of the European Respiratory Society. Methods: We describe patient's characteristics including asthma control assessed with Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) criteria, composite asthma severity index (CASI), exacerbations, unscheduled medical attendances, lung function and quality of life in children on biologic treatment because of severe asthma. We also assessed previous biologics use. Forced expiratory volume in 1 s, CASI, GINA, Paediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire score, exacerbations, unscheduled medical attendance and hospital admission comparisons in patients treated with different biologics were adjusted by age, sex and biologic therapy duration. Results: Among the 250 children (median age 13.2 years) recruited, 56.8% used omalizumab, 21.6% mepolizumab and 21.6% dupilumab. At enrolment, the dupilumab group was older (median 15.0 years), while the omalizumab group had been on biologic treatment the longest (median 622 days). Overall, 27% and 8% had partly controlled and uncontrolled asthma respectively, according to GINA. In the last 12 months, 52% and 29% had at least one and two exacerbations, respectively; airflow obstruction was found in 33%. 10% were admitted to hospital due to exacerbation. A previous switch from another biologic was recorded in 16%, predominantly due to nonresponse. Conclusions: Most children on biologics obtained good symptom control, but many still experienced asthma attacks. Switching between biologics was substantial. There is still an unmet need in severe paediatric asthma.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.