ReviewCurrent medical imaging2025
The Clinical Significance of Femoral and Tibial Anatomy for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury and Reconstruction
Review in Current medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in functional nanomaterials and piezoelectric biomaterials for personalized intramedullary fixation: addressing age-related orthopedic challenges.Frontiers in chemistry · 2026Review
- Menstrual cycle hormonal fluctuations and their associations with athletic performance and injury susceptibility in female athletes.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is a crucial stabilizer of the knee joint, and its injury risk and surgical outcomes are closely linked to femoral and tibial anatomy. This review focuses on current evidence on how skeletal parameters, such as femoral intercondylar notch morphology, tibial slope, and insertion site variations—influence ACL biomechanics. A narrowed or concave femoral notch raises the risk of impingement, while a higher posterior tibial slope makes anterior tibial translation worse, which increases ACL strain. Gender disparities exist, with females exhibiting smaller notch dimensions, and hormonal fluctuations may contribute to ligament laxity. Anatomical changes that come with getting older make clinical management even harder. Adolescent patients have problems with epiphyseal growth, and older patients have to deal with degenerative notch narrowing and lower bone density. Preoperative imaging (MRI, CT, and 3D reconstruction) enables precise assessment of anatomical variations, guiding individualized surgical strategies. Optimal femoral and tibial tunnel placement during reconstruction is vital to replicate native ACL biomechanics and avoid graft failure. Emerging technologies, including AI-driven segmentation and deep learning models, enhance risk prediction and intraoperative precision. Furthermore, synergistic factors, such as meniscal integrity and posterior oblique ligament anatomy, need to be integrated into comprehensive evaluations. Future directions emphasize personalized approaches, combining advanced imaging, neuromuscular training, and artificial intelligence to optimize prevention, diagnosis, and rehabilitation. Addressing age-specific challenges, such as growth plate preservation in pediatric cases and osteoarthritis management in the elderly, will improve long-term outcomes. Ultimately, a nuanced understanding of skeletal anatomy and technological integration holds promise for reducing ACL reinjury rates and enhancing patient recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.