Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40551461›Full record

ArticlePsycho-oncology2025

The Impact of Antidepressants on Surgical Outcomes Among Patients With Abdominal Cancer and Comorbid Depression.

Erryk S Katayama, Sidharth Iyer, Selamawit Woldesenbet, Zayed Rashid, Mujtaba Khalil, Kristen M Carpenter, Timothy M Pawlik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psycho-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Erryk S KatayamaDepartment of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Sidharth IyerDepartment of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Selamawit WoldesenbetDepartment of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Zayed RashidDepartment of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0009-0000-0500-8325
Mujtaba KhalilDepartment of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Kristen M CarpenterDepartments of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, Psychology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Timothy M PawlikDepartment of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7994-9870

Funding

NCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800009INCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800015INCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800032I
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDepression is commonly linked to cancer and may negatively impact patient outcomes; however, the influence of antidepressants on surgical outcomes remains unclear. We sought to evaluate the role of antidepressants among patients with gastrointestinal cancer and comorbid depression undergoing surgical resection.

methodsPatients diagnosed with hepatobiliary, pancreatic, and colorectal cancers (2008-2019) were identified within SEER-Medicare. Comorbid depression, within 12 months before or after a cancer diagnosis, and antidepressant prescriptions were assessed. An "ideal" postoperative textbook outcome required no complications, prolonged stay, 90-day readmission, or 90-day mortality. Hospitalization and post-discharge expenditures were also assessed.

resultsAmong 32,726 cancer patients (hepatobiliary: 2313, 7%; pancreatic: 2583, 8%; colorectal: 27,830, 85%), 1731 (5.3%) had documented depression (478 treated vs. 1253 untreated with antidepressant medications). Patients were more likely to receive treatment for depression if they were female (treated: 71% vs. untreated: 68%), White (treated: 88% vs. untreated: 80%), and had lower comorbidity burden (treated: 65% vs. untreated: 54%) (all p < 0.001). Patients with depression, both treated and untreated, had worse postoperative outcomes. Preoperative treatment with antidepressants decreased the effect of depression on adverse outcomes as patients with untreated depression were more likely to experience complications, prolonged stay, readmission, and mortality (all p < 0.001). Patients with untreated depression incurred higher in-hospital and 90-day post-discharge expenditures (no depression: $17,551; treated: $22,086 [7.3% increase]; untreated: $24,897 [10.2% increase]; p < 0.001).

conclusionsDepression reduced the likelihood to achieve optimal postoperative outcomes, yet antidepressant treatment preoperatively mitigated the size of these effects. Screening for depression and initiating appropriate therapy may enhance outcomes.

Indexed as

Antidepressive AgentsDepressionGastrointestinal NeoplasmsPostoperative ComplicationsAgedAged, 80 and overComorbidityFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMedicarePatient ReadmissionSEER ProgramTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesAntidepressive Agentsantidepressantcancerdepressiononcologyoutcomeserotoninsurgerysurgical oncology

Identifiers

PMID40551461
PMCPMC12185974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.