ArticleExperimental physiology2025
Computing muscle mechanical state variables from combined proprioceptive sensory feedback.
Article in Experimental physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Protocol for direct in vivo evaluation of the stretch reflex in adult mice.STAR protocols · 2026Article
- Measures of Human Position Sense Do Not Always Include Contributions From Peripheral Sensory Receptors.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Article
- Computing muscle mechanical state variables from combined proprioceptive sensory feedback.Experimental physiology · 2025Article
- Experimental physiology Special Issue: 'Mechanotransduction, muscle spindles and proprioception'.Experimental physiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Proprioceptive sensory feedback is crucial for the control of movement. In many ways, sensorimotor control loops in the neuromuscular system act as state feedback controllers. These controllers combine input commands and sensory feedback regarding the mechanical state of the muscle, joint or limb to modulate the mechanical output of the muscles. To understand how these control circuits function, it is necessary to understand fully the mechanical state variables that are signalled by proprioceptive sensory (propriosensory) afferents. Using new computational approaches, we demonstrate how combinations of group Ia and II muscle spindle afferent feedback can allow for tuned responses to force and the rate of force (or length and velocity) and how combinations of muscle spindle and Golgi tendon organ feedback can parse external and internal (self-generated) force. These models suggest that muscle spindle feedback might be used to monitor and control muscle forces in addition to length and velocity and, when combined with tendon organ feedback, can distinguish self-generated from externally imposed forces. Given that these models combine feedback from different sensory afferent types, they emphasize the utility of analysing muscle propriosensors as an integrated population, rather than independently, to gain a better understanding of propriosensory-motor control. Furthermore, these models propose a framework that links neural connectivity in the spinal cord with neuromechanical control. Although considerable work has been done on propriosensory-motor pathways in the CNS, our aim is to build upon this work by emphasizing the mechanical context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.