Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40551411›Full record

ArticleExperimental physiology2025

Computing muscle mechanical state variables from combined proprioceptive sensory feedback.

Jacob D Stephens, Lena H Ting, Timothy C Cope

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jacob D StephensCoulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8568-5533
Lena H TingCoulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6854-9444
Timothy C CopeCoulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8835-8055

Funding

Multiscale models of proprioceptive encoding to reveal mechanisms of impaired sensorimotor controlR01HD090642 · NICHD · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI COPE, TIMOTHY C, SAWICKI, GREGORY STEPHEN · 2016 to 2025
$4.9M
Training in Computational Neural EngineeringT32EB025816 · NIBIB · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI Michael Robert Borich, Christopher John Rozell · 2019 to 2026
$1.9M
Georgia Tech/Emory NIH/NIBIB Training Program in Computational Neural-Engineering T32EB025816NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB025816NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD090642
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proprioceptive sensory feedback is crucial for the control of movement. In many ways, sensorimotor control loops in the neuromuscular system act as state feedback controllers. These controllers combine input commands and sensory feedback regarding the mechanical state of the muscle, joint or limb to modulate the mechanical output of the muscles. To understand how these control circuits function, it is necessary to understand fully the mechanical state variables that are signalled by proprioceptive sensory (propriosensory) afferents. Using new computational approaches, we demonstrate how combinations of group Ia and II muscle spindle afferent feedback can allow for tuned responses to force and the rate of force (or length and velocity) and how combinations of muscle spindle and Golgi tendon organ feedback can parse external and internal (self-generated) force. These models suggest that muscle spindle feedback might be used to monitor and control muscle forces in addition to length and velocity and, when combined with tendon organ feedback, can distinguish self-generated from externally imposed forces. Given that these models combine feedback from different sensory afferent types, they emphasize the utility of analysing muscle propriosensors as an integrated population, rather than independently, to gain a better understanding of propriosensory-motor control. Furthermore, these models propose a framework that links neural connectivity in the spinal cord with neuromechanical control. Although considerable work has been done on propriosensory-motor pathways in the CNS, our aim is to build upon this work by emphasizing the mechanical context.

Indexed as

Feedback, SensoryMuscle, SkeletalProprioceptionAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansModels, BiologicalMuscle Spindlescomputational modellingGolgi tendon organmuscle spindleproprioception

Identifiers

PMID40551411
PMCPMC12486326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.