Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40551384›Full record

SynthesisTropical medicine & international health : TM & IH2025

Effect of glycemic control on tuberculosis treatment outcomes among patients with tuberculosis and diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Maham Zahid, Saima Afaq, Kashif Shafique, Fatima Khalid Qazi, Urooj Ashfaq, Muhammad Asim, Shaista Nooreen, Sofia Shehzad

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maham ZahidInstitute of Public Health & Social Sciences, Khyber Medical University, Peshawar, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2878-0435
Saima AfaqInstitute of Public Health & Social Sciences, Khyber Medical University, Peshawar, Pakistan.
Kashif ShafiqueSchool of Public Health, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7151-5122
Fatima Khalid QaziInstitute of Public Health & Social Sciences, Khyber Medical University, Peshawar, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8652-6198
Urooj AshfaqInstitute of Public Health & Social Sciences, Khyber Medical University, Peshawar, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2844-1041
Muhammad AsimInstitute of Public Health & Social Sciences, Khyber Medical University, Peshawar, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6759-8889
Shaista NooreenInstitute of Public Health & Social Sciences, Khyber Medical University, Peshawar, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1950-2719
Sofia ShehzadSardar Begum Dental College, Gandhara University, Peshawar, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5190-2114

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTuberculosis (TB) and diabetes mellitus comorbidity can lead to poor TB treatment outcomes, particularly with uncontrolled blood glucose levels. Understanding the impact of glycemic control on TB treatment outcomes is essential.

objectiveTo synthesise evidence on the association between glycemic control and TB treatment outcomes in patients with TB and diabetes mellitus. METHODOLOGY: A systematic review was conducted using Medline, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) and Google Scholar for all types of studies published between 1975 and May 2024, including adult TB patients of >18 years of age, with or without diabetes mellitus for whom blood glucose testing along with TB treatment outcome comparison with glucose levels (low/high) was reported were considered for inclusion. A random-effects model was used for meta-analysis, heterogeneity was assessed using I-squared statistics, subgroup and sensitivity analysis was performed followed by publication bias assessment.

resultsOf 576 identified studies, 12 met the inclusion criteria, analysing 2320 cases (1572 with uncontrolled high blood glucose [≥7% HbA1c] and 748 with controlled low blood glucose [<7% HbA1c]). Low certainty evidence shows that patients with uncontrolled high glucose had a 1.91 times higher risk of TB treatment failure (risk ratios [RR] = 1.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.81-3.07, p = 0.008), and a 2.97 times higher risk of sputum positivity at 3 months (RR = 2.97, 95% CI 1.10-8.07, p = 0.03). Subgroup and sensitivity analyses showed significant improvement in pooled effects, lowering of heterogeneity and narrower CIs. For overall pooled effect, substantial heterogeneity was observed; therefore, the interpretation and generalisation of results should be done with caution.

conclusionA low certainty evidence shows that uncontrolled high blood glycemic level significantly impacts TB treatment outcomes, increasing treatment failure and sputum positivity among TB patients with diabetes mellitus.

Indexed as

Antitubercular AgentsDiabetes MellitusGlycemic ControlTuberculosisBlood GlucoseHumansTreatment OutcomeAntitubercular AgentsBlood Glucoseblood glucosediabetesglycaemic controltreatment failuretuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID40551384
PMCPMC12318439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.