ArticlePerioperative medicine (London, England)2025
In search of a characterisation of frailty: applying exploratory factor analysis to ageing preoperative patients : Cross-sectional study.
Article in Perioperative medicine (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFrailty is a useful prognostic concept which has spread to many clinical settings, including perioperative medicine. However, there is no consensus on its definition. This situation could impair its screening and the correction of underlying disturbances that have an influence on the clinical course of ageing patients.
methodsIn order to achieve a more precise characterisation of frailty, an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was performed on the variables of eight frailty scales: Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), FRAIL scale, Edmonton scale, Fried criteria, Robinson scale, Risk Analysis Index, the Frailty Index and the Modified Frailty Index. Later, a concordance study between the factors found in EFA and frailty according to the CFS (≥ 4 points) was conducted. One-hundred nine preoperative patients aged 65 years or older (60% men) were included, and data were collected from medical history and physical and laboratory tests. Our aim was to explain the behaviour of well-known frailty-related variables by identifying the factors that influenced them and to investigate whether these factors were related to frailty.
resultsThree factors were found, each relating to a different set of variables: F1 representing comorbidities; F2 being an aggregation of disturbances in physical activity, cognitive status and anaemia; and F3 portraying alterations of the emotional sphere. The concordance study showed a strong association of F2 with frailty: adjusted OR 3.65 (95% CI 1.57 to 8.53). F3 presented a milder relationship: OR 2.54 (95% CI 1.28 to 5.02). No association of F1 with frailty was found: OR 1.15 (95% CI 0.58 to 2.26).
conclusionsIn our quest to characterise frailty, we found that this is best described by an aggregate of reductions in physical activity, impairment in cognitive status and anaemia, while comorbidities are not associated with it. This could support a modified version of the phenotypic model against other paradigms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.