Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40551254›Full record

Trial reportBreast cancer research : BCR2025

Combined prognostic impact of initial clinical stage and residual cancer burden after neoadjuvant systemic therapy in triple-negative and HER2-positive breast cancer: an analysis of the I-SPY2 randomized clinical trial.

Roberto A Leon-Ferre, K Dimitroff, C Yau, K V Giridhar, R Mukhtar, G Hirst, N Hylton, J Perlmutter, A DeMichele, D Yee and 6 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01042379 (I-SPY Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01042379 phase2recruitingnot on this map

I-SPY Trial (Investigation of Serial Studies to Predict Your Therapeutic Response With Imaging And moLecular Analysis 2)

TypeinterventionalSponsorQuantumLeap Healthcare CollaborativeRan2010 to 2031Enrolled5,000ConditionsBreast Neoplasms, Breast Cancer, Breast Tumors, AngiosarcomaArmsStandard Therapy, AMG 386 with or without Trastuzumab, AMG 479 (Ganitumab) plus Metformin, MK-2206 with or without Trastuzumab, AMG 386 and Trastuzumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Roberto A Leon-FerreMayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rochester, MN, USA. leonferre.roberto@mayo.edu.
K DimitroffUniversity of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA.
C YauUniversity of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA.
K V GiridharMayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rochester, MN, USA.
R MukhtarUniversity of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA.
G HirstUniversity of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA.
N HyltonUniversity of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA.
J PerlmutterGemini Group, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
A DeMicheleUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
D YeeUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
L van 't VeerUniversity of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA.
H RugoUniversity of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA.
W F SymmansUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
M P GoetzMayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rochester, MN, USA.
L EssermanUniversity of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA.
J C BougheyMayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rochester, MN, USA.

Funding

The Role of CHFR in Tumorigenesis and Paclitaxel-Sensitivity in Breast CancerP50CA116201 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI PETER C LUCAS · 2005 to 2026
$49.9M
The I SPY 2.2 TRIAL: Evolving to Imaging and Molecular Biomarker Response Directed Adaptive Sequential Treatment to Optimize Breast Cancer OutcomesP01CA210961 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Nola M. Hylton-Watson · 2017 to 2026
$22.9M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA210961NCI NIH HHS P50 CA116201
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOperable triple-negative (TNBC) and HER2-positive breast cancer are often treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST). NAST response is highly prognostic, with pathologic complete response (pCR) being associated with low risk of recurrence or death. In contrast, residual disease (RD) after NAST is associated with higher risks and is an indication for escalated postoperative therapy. Recent studies suggest that tumor (T) size and nodal (N) status at diagnosis influence clinical outcomes independent of NAST response. We evaluated the impact of initial clinical stage on clinical outcomes according to response to NAST in I-SPY2. PATIENTS AND

methodsPatients with stage II or III TNBC or HER2-positive breast cancer treated on the I-SPY2 trial (NCT01042379) with required data on clinical T size and N status prior to NAST, residual cancer burden (RCB) index, recurrence and survival were included. Survival outcomes, including event-free (EFS), distant recurrence-free (DRFS), and overall survival (OS), were assessed using multivariable Cox proportional hazard models.

resultsAmong 1,033 patients (TNBC: 638, HER2-positive: 395), the median follow-up was 4.4 years (range 0.3-10.2). 47% achieved pCR (TNBC: 44%, HER2-positive: 51%). Smaller baseline T size, but not N status, was associated with higher pCR rates. However, in those not achieving pCR, RCB class was correlated with both baseline T size and N status in TNBC, and with baseline N status (but not T size) in HER2-positive. Among patients with RD, larger baseline T size was independently associated with worse EFS and DRFS in TNBC and HER2-positive, and with OS in TNBC; while N status was associated with EFS and DRFS in TNBC on univariate analysis only. We did not identify an association between baseline T size or N status and outcomes in patients achieving pCR.

conclusionsTumor size at diagnosis remained an independent prognostic factor in patients with TNBC and HER2-positive breast cancer with RD after NAST. In contrast, patients achieving pCR had excellent outcomes regardless of initial disease extent, supporting the relevance of pCR as a surrogate endpoint in breast cancer.

trial registrationI-SPY 2 TRIAL beginning December 31, 2009: Neoadjuvant and Personalized Adaptive Novel Agents to Treat Breast Cancer (I-SPY 2), NCT01042379.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm, ResidualNeoplasm StagingPrognosisTreatment OutcomeTumor BurdenERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesClinical stageHER2-positive breast cancerNeoadjuvant chemotherapyPathologic complete responseResidual cancer burdenTriple-negative breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID40551254
PMCPMC12183850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.