SynthesisEuropean journal of medical research2025
Probiotics and gastrointestinal disorders: an umbrella meta-analysis of therapeutic efficacy.
Synthesis in European journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Efficacy of Specific Probiotic Strains in Subtypes of Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Pooled it
- Effect of host and gut microbiota-altering interventions on sarcopenia or its defining parameters: a systematic review and meta-analysis of nutrition-based intervention studies.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2025Pooled it
- Gut microbiome dynamics in acute infectious diarrhea: A conceptual framework from acute dysbiosis toward precision restoration (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2026Review
- Probiotic Use and Self-Reported Psychological, Cognitive, and Gastrointestinal Outcomes in a Community Sample: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study.Brain and behavior · 2026Observational
- Gastric microbiota‑derived postbiotics as antimicrobial and anti‑biofilm agents.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients Treated with Synbiotics: a Prospective Observational Study.Maedica · 2026Article
- Probiotics and the Human Microbiome: Classical Functions, Emerging Systemic Roles, and Future Therapeutic Frontiers.Biology · 2026Review
- Effect of probiotic and herbal complex supplementation on health status, mineral composition, and bone morphometric characteristics of fattening lambs.Open veterinary journal · 2026Article
- Safety and Tolerability of the Gut BacteriumNutrients · 2026Article
- Meta-analysis of efficacy of probiotics in reducing postoperative infections and improving outcomes in gastrointestinal surgery.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
- FMT and Bifidobacterium quadruple viable tablets supplementation modulate gut microbiota to ameliorate high-altitude exposure induced colonic injury.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Impact of Oral Administration ofBiomedicines · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProbiotic interventions are increasingly considered for alleviating gastrointestinal disorders such as diarrhea, nausea, bloating, and epigastric discomfort. This umbrella meta-analysis aims to resolve inconsistencies in existing research and offers a comprehensive assessment of probiotics' impact on these gastrointestinal symptoms.
methodsWe conducted an extensive literature search across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar (up to June 2024), including meta-analyses of interventional studies investigating probiotics' effects on gastrointestinal disorders. Pooled effect sizes with 95% confidence intervals were derived using a random-effects model, accompanied by subgroup and sensitivity analyses. The certainty of evidence and study quality were evaluated using AMSTAR 2 tools.
resultsProbiotic supplementation was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of diarrhea (RR 0.44; 95% CI 0.37-0.52), nausea (RR 0.59; 95% CI 0.49-0.60), epigastric pain (RR 0.71; 95% CI 0.56-0.87), bloating (RR 0.74; 95% CI 0.64-0.84), and taste disturbance (RR 0.55; 95% CI 0.36-0.75), all with p-values < 0.001. Subgroup analyses revealed more pronounced effects in studies with shorter intervention durations (≤ 2-4 weeks), and multi-strain formulations, particularly for diarrhea and epigastric pain. However, moderate to high heterogeneity and generally low methodological quality among several included meta-analyses limit the robustness of the findings.
conclusionThis umbrella meta-analysis demonstrates the potential effectiveness of probiotics in alleviating gastrointestinal symptoms. However, the findings should be interpreted with caution due to moderate to high heterogeneity and the generally low methodological quality of many included studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.