ArticleConflict and health2025
Exploring diabetic patients experiences during war in Sudan: insights from a multi-city study.
Article in Conflict and health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevalence and associated factors of diabetic foot ulcer among patients with diabetes mellitus in Eastern Sudan: A cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Adherence to anti-seizure medications among pediatric epilepsy patients during the Sudan armed conflict.Conflict and health · 2026Article
- Cognitive impairment and associated factors among adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus in eastern Sudan: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe health system in Sudan was severely compromised by the ongoing conflict, jeopardizing the lives of millions of vulnerable people suffering from chronic health conditions, including diabetic patients. This study explored the experiences of diabetic patients, focusing on the challenges they faced in accessing medical consultations, medications, and blood glucose monitoring during the ongoing war.
methodsA descriptive facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted across seven hospitals and diabetes centers in Sudan from May to July 2024, enrolling 350 diabetic patients. Convenient sampling was used to select the participants from the outpatient clinics of the targeted health facilities. Data was collected by interviewing patients using a structured questionnaire.
resultsSixty percent of participants faced challenges accessing medications, with drug shortages (65.9%), the closure of pharmacies (44.1%), and safety concerns (39.8%) being the major barriers. Insulin users experienced significant difficulties, with 69.1% reporting problems storing their medications due to frequent power outages. The majority of patients (81.1%) faced challenges accessing medical care during the war. The most common difficulties included transportation issues and long wait times or overcrowding. The war disrupted the healthy eating habits of 34.9% of patients. Moreover, 54.3% of patients experienced a decline in blood sugar testing frequency, often due to the unavailability of laboratories and financial constraints. Displaced patients and patients in Al Mangal City suffered the most from these challenges.
conclusionThis study reveals the devastating impact of the ongoing conflict on diabetes care in Sudan. Severe disruptions to healthcare access, including medication shortages and limited resources, have forced patients to adopt hazardous coping mechanisms. Urgent action is needed, including humanitarian aid and innovative interventions, to ensure equitable and sustainable diabetes care for all Sudanese patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.