ArticleHuman resources for health2025
Development and validation of a tool to assess core competencies of public health professionals in low-income settings: findings from Uttar Pradesh, India.
Article in Human resources for health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMany low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) lack instruments to measure gaps in the public health competency of health professionals. The objective of this study is to develop a validated and reliable Core Public Health Competency (COPHEC) index by assessing the knowledge, skills, abilities, and attitudes of senior and mid-level public health professionals with supervisory and management responsibilities in Uttar Pradesh (UP), India.
methodsUsing the Core Competency framework that was developed in UP, we generated a draft COPHEC tool with 37 items, measured on a four-point Likert scale. We administered the tool to a total of 166 public health professionals that included two samples-84 senior and 82 mid-level public health professionals. To extract factors and assign factor scores to the instrument, we performed an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) using principal component analysis (PCA). Content and face validities were assessed by examining the steps used for the construction of the draft tool. Construct validity was measured by assessing the average factor loading of the items onto the component extracted from EFA. Internal consistency was used as a measure of reliability.
resultsThe final COPHEC index had 37 items loaded on one factor in the sample. Content and face validities were assured through a participatory process with relevant stakeholders who identified the initial set of items as part of a Core Competency framework. Construct validity of the COPHEC scale was confirmed by the high average factor loading of components ranging from 0.58 to 0.81. The final index showed adequate reliability with Cronbach's alpha (α) = 0.97.
conclusionsThe COPHEC index is a valid and reliable measure of core competencies in public health in UP. We recommend that governments adapt the index in LMICs to conduct assessments of health workers to identify training needs, evaluate the effectiveness of training programs through participants' competency acquisition pre- and post-training, and inform workforce development efforts in recruitment and performance management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.