Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40551164›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2025

Seroepidemiology of Rickettsia conorii in dogs in Portugal: a comprehensive 12-year retrospective study (2013-2024).

Ricardo Lopes, Hugo Lima de Carvalho, Andreia Garcês, Cátia Fernandes, Ana Patrícia Lopes, Ângela Martins, Elsa Leclerc Duarte, Luís Cardoso, Ana Cláudia Coelho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Molecular Detection ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ricardo LopesDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (UTAD), Vila Real, Portugal.
Hugo Lima de CarvalhoCEDIVET Veterinary Laboratories, Lionesa Business Hub, Leça do Balio, Portugal.
Andreia GarcêsWildlife Rehabilitation Centre (CRAS), Veterinary Teaching Hospital, UTAD, Vila Real, Portugal.
Cátia FernandesAnicura Santa Marinha Veterinary Hospital, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal.
Ana Patrícia LopesDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (UTAD), Vila Real, Portugal.
Ângela MartinsAnimal and Veterinary Research Centre (CECAV), Associate Laboratory for Animal and Veterinary Sciences (AL4AnimalS), UTAD, Vila Real, Portugal.
Elsa Leclerc DuarteDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, School of Science and Technology, University of Évora, Évora, Portugal.
Luís CardosoDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (UTAD), Vila Real, Portugal. lcardoso@utad.pt.
Ana Cláudia CoelhoDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (UTAD), Vila Real, Portugal.

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia UI/00772
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMediterranean spotted fever (MSF), caused by Rickettsia conorii, is a zoonotic tick-borne disease of important public health concern, particularly in the Mediterranean Basin. Dogs serve as key sentinels for MSF due to their exposure to vector ticks and close contact with humans. To date, no comprehensive study in Portugal has investigated epidemiological risk factors in dogs infected with or exposed to R. conorii.

methodsSeropositivity to R. conorii was determined using an immunofluorescence antibody test (IFAT), with titres categorised as negative, low positive, moderate positive and high positive. Statistical analyses included the chi-squared test and univariable logistic regression to assess associations between seropositivity and geographical region, season, month, size, breed, sex and age.

resultsThis study analysed 2457 canine samples submitted from 228 veterinary medical centres across mainland Portugal and insular autonomous regions between 2013 and 2024. The overall seroprevalence of R. conorii was 27.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 25.3-28.8). Significant differences in seroprevalence were observed amongst regions, with the highest values in the Algarve (48.0%; odds ratio [OR] 3.1, 95% CI 2.2-4.4, P < 0.001), Alentejo (35.0%; OR 1.8, 95% CI 0.7-4.6, P = 0.210) and Centre (33.8%; OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.4-2.1, P < 0.001) regions. Giant breeds had the highest seroprevalence (33.0%; OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.3-6.6, P = 0.008), with Irish Setter and Miniature Schnauzer identified as high-risk breeds (75.0%; OR 27.0, 95% CI 1.3-578.4, P = 0.035). Male dogs had higher seroprevalence (28.9%; OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.0-1.5, P = 0.023), whilst geriatric dogs showed the highest risk of exposure to or infection with R. conorii (34.6%; OR 5.2, 95% CI 2.8-9.8, P < 0.001).

conclusionsThis study represents the most extensive epidemiological analysis of canine MSF in Portugal. The findings highlight associations between R. conorii seropositivity and geographical region, size, breed, sex and age of dogs, advancing the limited knowledge on the epidemiology of R. conorii in Portugal and underscoring the need for regional surveillance and targeted prevention to reduce infection risks in both canine populations and public health contexts.

Indexed as

Boutonneuse FeverDog DiseasesRickettsia conoriiAnimalsAntibodies, BacterialDogsFemaleMalePortugalRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSeroepidemiologic StudiesAntibodies, BacterialCanine seropositivityOne healthRickettsia conoriiSeroprevalenceTick-borne infectionsVector-borne diseasesZoonosis

Identifiers

PMID40551164
PMCPMC12186362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.