ArticleThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2025
Are we working (too) comfortably?: the systematic development of an intervention to support workers to move more while working at home.
Article in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCovid-19 accelerated a transformational change in working practices, with a considerable proportion of desk-based workers now engaged in home or hybrid working. Working at home appears to exacerbate the already elevated levels of unhealthy occupational sedentary behaviour, and there is a need to support employees to reduce sedentary behaviour while working at home. The aim of this study was to develop an intervention to support employees to reduce sedentary behaviour when working at home utilising the novel integration of the Six Steps in Quality Intervention Development (6SQuID) and Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW) intervention development frameworks.
methodsWe report on 6SQuID steps 1-5, with the Capability, Opportunity and Motivation influence on Behaviour (COM-B) model integrated into steps 1-4, providing a theoretical organising framework. In step 4, the intervention functions and behaviour change technique elements of the BCW were used to accurately and consistently specify the active ingredients of the intervention. The test and refine phase of 6SQuID (step 5) evaluated the acceptability of elements of the intervention with a sample of Scottish Government employees.
resultsThe causal factors for employee sedentary behaviour while working at home were delineated, and theory of change/action models were constructed. Intervention components were developed to address causal factors and presented as a toolkit on an online platform. These comprised: 1) education on sedentary behaviour, 2) resources to aid intention formation and action planning, 3) strategies to increase movement, and 4) suggestions for support from colleagues/friends/family. Strategies aimed at line managers and organisations to support employees and create an organisational culture that enables employees to move more were also developed. The acceptability testing demonstrated the value of the toolkit format incorporating a suite of strategies, and feedback informed refinement of the toolkit.
conclusionsThis study addresses the urgent need to support employees to reduce sedentary behaviour while working at home. Using the novel application of integrated intervention development frameworks, a comprehensive intervention toolkit has been formulated and preliminarily tested. The toolkit comprises strategies and resources for employees, line managers and organisations. Further feasibility and effectiveness testing with a larger sample is recommended prior to large-scale implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.