ArticleInternational journal of emergency medicine2025
Acute phase reactants in the diagnosis of soft tissue infections of the upper extremity.
Article in International journal of emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUpper extremity soft tissue infections are commonly encountered in emergency department settings and often require timely interventions. Acute phase reactants, such as C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and white blood cell count (WBC), are commonly used in diagnostic workups. However, the utility of these biomarkers in the management of upper extremity infections remains uncertain. This study evaluates the diagnostic value of these acute phase reactants in a broad cohort of patients requiring intervention for upper extremity infections.
resultsA retrospective review over five years identified 103 patients with upper extremity infections who required incision and drainage. The study found variable sensitivity and reliability of acute phase reactants, particularly for infections distal to the wrist. The average ESR was 42 mm/hr, CRP 64.1 mg/L, and WBC 10.5 × 10³/uL. Of patients with normal acute phase reactants, all had infections located at or distal to the wrist. Notably, patients with culture-negative infections did not exhibit significant differences in laboratory values compared to those with positive cultures.
conclusionsOur study highlights the limitations of acute phase reactants as diagnostic tools for upper extremity infections, particularly in cases involving infections distal to the wrist. Despite the frequent elevation of these markers in infections requiring surgical intervention, they should not be relied upon as sole determinants of management. A thorough clinical examination and history remain critical in guiding treatment decisions. This study underscores the need for caution when using these biomarkers to rule in or rule out infection in the emergency department.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.