ArticleBiomedical engineering online2025
Performance of deep-learning models incorporating knee alignment information for predicting ground reaction force during walking.
Article in Biomedical engineering online, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dual-Model Artificial Intelligence Framework Integrating AI-Based Markerless Motion Capture for Dynamic Gait Prediction and Health-Status Classification.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Two-stage posture enhancement and stability modelling for pre-fall risk detection in athletic movements.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWearable sensors combined with deep-learning models are increasingly being used to predict biomechanical variables. Researchers have focused on either simple neural networks or complex pretrained models with multiple layers. In addition, studies have rarely integrated knee alignment information or the side affected by injury as features to improve model predictions. In this study, we compared the performance of selected model architectures, including complex pretrained models, in predicting three-dimensional (3D) ground reaction force (GRF) data during level walking by using data obtained from motion capture systems and wearable accelerometers.
resultsTen deep-learning models for predicting the 3D GRF were developed using motion capture and accelerometer data with or without subject-specific features. Incorporating subject-specific features improved prediction accuracy for all models except the long short-term memory (LSTM) model. A two-dimensional (2D)-CNN-LSTM hybrid model achieved the best results. Established models, such as ResNet50 and Inception, performed better when trained with pretrained ImageNet weights and subject-specific features, underscoring the value of pretrained knowledge and subject-specific information for improving accuracy. However, these models did not outperform the custom hybrid models in predicting time-series 3D GRF data, indicating that larger models do not necessarily perform better for time-series applications but do always have greater computational demands.
conclusionIncorporating subject-specific features, such as alignment information, enhanced the accuracy of GRF predictions during walking. Complex pretrained models were outperformed by custom hybrid models for time-series 3D GRF prediction during walking. Custom models with lower computational demands and using alignment features are a more efficient and effective choice for applications requiring accurate and resource-efficient predictions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.