ArticleAnatomical sciences education2025
Long-term outcomes of a graduate course design institute: A model for growing the anatomy education workforce.
Article in Anatomical sciences education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinician perspectives on preclinical radiology education: a qualitative study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Long-term outcomes of a graduate course design institute: A model for growing the anatomy education workforce.Anatomical sciences education · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Developing the next generation of anatomy educators is an expansive challenge that involves developing pathways for established scientists into the profession, and increasing the number of graduate level trainees who are both interested in anatomy education and qualified for educational work. In this article, we present long-term outcomes from a national-level pedagogy development program that anatomists from across a national network could use as a model to disseminate anatomical science pedagogy to future faculty, potentially expanding the anatomy education workforce pipeline. Transforming Your Research into Teaching (TYRIT) is a multi-institutional program for graduate students and postdoctoral scholars focused on course design skills. To understand the lasting impact of this course design institute, we conducted a survey-based retrospective study of three cohorts of TYRIT alumni, over 600 graduate student and postdoctoral participants. We asked participants if they had implemented their course design projects, and if so, how their project changed from what they originally designed. We also asked TYRIT alumni to share why they enrolled in this program, their perception of program outcomes, and their reflections on program aspects that contributed to their course design project. Study results indicate that skills learned during the program reliably resulted in implemented projects across a multi-year timeline. Furthermore, we demonstrate that TYRIT met needs particular to graduate students and postdoctoral scholars in the sciences, including pedagogical skills, social support, and career needs. These findings demonstrate that graduate/postdoctoral development in course design provides a foundation for future teaching work that is both durable and adaptable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.