ArticleUpdates in surgery2025
The ACTIVE study: surgical outcomes for minimally invasive and open approach to incisional ventral hernias in a non-elective setting.
Article in Updates in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improving cost-efficiency in port-site fascial closure: a novel Veress-needle technique and a comprehensive literature review.Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- The concept of Laparoscopic Intracorporeal Rectus Aponeuroplasty (LIRA) technique in complex abdominal hernias based on size and location.BMC surgery · 2026Article
- Long-term outcomes of a modified LIRA (laparoscopic intracorporeal rectus aponeuroplasty) technique for ventral hernia repair.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Chronic Groin Pain After Hernia Surgery: What Are We Missing?Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSurgical repair of incisional ventral hernias (VH) is a standard procedure globally, with an increasing role in minimally invasive techniques. This study aims to evaluate postoperative outcomes in emergency repairs for VH, comparing surgical features of open and laparoscopic approaches.
methodsA retrospective multicentric study (ACTIVE study) was created to evaluate the surgical outcome of VH repair in emergency settings. Data were collected from demographic, preoperative, intra-operative, and postoperative variables, focusing on 30-day morbidity and other short- and long-term outcomes.
resultsData from 556 patients who underwent emergency VH repair were collected and analyzed, with 175 patients treated with a Minimally Invasive (MIS) approach (31.5%) and 381 (68.5%) receiving open repair. The defect size was larger in the open group (p < 0.001), and operative time was shorter in the MIS group (p = 0.002). Prosthetic repair was more frequently chosen in the MIS group (p < 0.001), with a shorter length of stay (p = 0.013). Postoperative complications and Intensive Care Unit admissions were higher in the open group. The MIS had shorter operative times, smaller defect sizes, and higher mesh usage, even with concurrent bowel resection.
conclusionsThis study confirmed the feasibility and safety of the laparoscopic approach to VH in emergency settings. Despite the lack of solid evidence for routine adoption in emergency settings, the MIS approach demonstrated a lower overall complication rate, shorter hospital stays, and reduced mortality. The laparoscopic approach is a safe and valid tool for tailored surgery, even in emergent settings in selected patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40551061What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.