Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40551055›Full record

Trial reportCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2025

Investigating the neural and behavioral correlates of the stress-rumination link in healthy humans by modulating the left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex using Theta Burst Stimulation.

Isabell Int-Veen, Ute Eßer, Sandra Ladegast, Leonhard Liermann, Ramona Täglich, Betti Schopp, Hans-Christoph Nuerk, Christian Plewnia, Agnes Kroczek, Stefanie De Smet and 5 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Isabell Int-VeenTübingen Center for Mental Health (TüCMH), Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany. isabell.int-veen@med.uni-tuebingen.de.ORCID 0000-0002-1534-0193
Ute EßerTübingen Center for Mental Health (TüCMH), Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Sandra LadegastTübingen Center for Mental Health (TüCMH), Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Leonhard LiermannTübingen Center for Mental Health (TüCMH), Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Ramona TäglichTübingen Center for Mental Health (TüCMH), Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Betti SchoppTübingen Center for Mental Health (TüCMH), Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Hans-Christoph NuerkDepartment of Psychology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Christian PlewniaTübingen Center for Mental Health (TüCMH), Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Agnes KroczekTübingen Center for Mental Health (TüCMH), Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Stefanie De SmetDepartment of Head and Skin, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Marie-Anne VanderhasseltDepartment of Head and Skin, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Andreas J FallgatterTübingen Center for Mental Health (TüCMH), Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Ann-Christine EhlisTübingen Center for Mental Health (TüCMH), Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Beatrix BarthTübingen Center for Mental Health (TüCMH), Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
David RosenbaumTübingen Center for Mental Health (TüCMH), Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

Funding

FWO-Flanders for research projects for fundamental research G044019NFWO-Flanders for research projects for fundamental research G044222NFWO-Flanders PhD fellowship 3F001120German Research Foundation D.27.18596
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Theta Burst Stimulation (TBS) offers a noninvasive way to modulate neural activation patterns, helping to explore the causal role of brain regions in psychiatric symptoms. Prefrontal hypoactivation is commonly observed in high ruminators and patients with depression during stress. However, the impact of modulating Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex (DLPFC) activity via excitatory and inhibitory TBS during stress remains unexplored. We studied 88 healthy participants (44 low, 44 high ruminators), each attending two appointments that included stress induction using the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) and cortical oxygenation assessment with functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS). Participants received either intermittent TBS (iTBS) or continuous TBS (cTBS) applied to the left DLPFC, with sessions randomized between active and sham stimulation. While TBS had no impact on positive affect, TSST performance, or heart rate, we observed effects on stress, state rumination, negative affect, and cortical oxygenation. We observed higher stress and higher negative affect during and after the TSST in high ruminators receiving iTBS compared with sham TBS (sTBS). Low ruminators showed reduced state rumination increases after iTBS compared with sTBS at their second appointment. fNIRS data revealed cortical oxygenation differences during the TSST, although only without multiple comparison corrections. Descriptively, we observed higher activation in the left Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex (VLPFC) following cTBS compared with sTBS in high ruminators but lower cortical oxygenation following cTBS compared with sTBS in low ruminators but only when participants received active stimulation first. This suggests stimulation sequence affects repeated-measures TMS studies in stress contexts. Findings highlight expectancy effects and suggest a potential reduction in TBS impact due to strong hemodynamic responses during stress. HIGHLIGHTS: • High ruminators showed increased stress and negative affect after iTBS during the TSST. • Neural data showed increased cortical oxygenation in the left Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex (VLPFC) following cTBS to the left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex (DLPFC) in high ruminators. • In low ruminators, cTBS led to decreased activation, but only when active stimulation was administered first, highlighting the role of stimulation order in TBS outcomes. • Expectancy effects and habituation are important aspects to be considered in repeated measures designs involving TBS and stress-reactive rumination.

Indexed as

AffectDorsolateral Prefrontal CortexPrefrontal CortexStress, PsychologicalTheta RhythmTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAdultFemaleHeart RateHumansMaleSpectroscopy, Near-InfraredYoung AdultDorsolateral Prefrontal CortexRuminationStressTheta Burst StimulationTrier Social Stress Test

Identifiers

PMID40551055
PMCPMC12464127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.