ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2025
Cognitive appraisal modulates Theta Burst Stimulation effects on stress-reactive rumination and affect.
Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The DLPFC plays a central role in cognitive appraisal and stress regulation, as this process-particularly secondary appraisal, where individuals assess their ability to cope with a situation-significantly influences stress responses on both psychological and physiological levels. We conducted a study where we applied different types of Theta Burst Stimulation (intermittent (i)TBS vs. continuous (c)TBS vs. sham (s)TBS) to the left DLPFC to increase or decrease the cortical excitability of the prefrontal neural network. We then examined how participants responded psychologically and physiologically to a potent psychosocial stressor, the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST), and aimed to investigate the influence of secondary cognitive appraisal on the effects of TBS on the stress response. Depending on the stimulation, we discovered that the cognitive appraisal significantly influenced rumination, positive and negative affect specifically in stress recovery. More precisely, as expected, individuals who perceived greater control experienced a faster recovery of stress-reactive ruminative thinking following sTBS and lower rumination following the stressor. We found lower increases and faster recovery of negative affect in all stimulation conditions and faster decreases in positive affect after the TSST following cTBS and iTBS, suggesting beneficial effects of both stimulation conditions. Concerning the assessed physiological variables, namely heart rate, heart rate variability, and salivary cortisol, we did not observe any impact of appraisal. These findings suggest that the effect of secondary appraisal on psychological variables depends on the type of stimulation, and while it may be linked to increased DLPFC activity, further research is needed to clarify the neurostimulation mechanisms involved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.