Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40551042›Full record

ReviewCurrent osteoporosis reports2025

The Role of Osteoporosis in Total Hip Arthroplasty Periprosthetic Fractures and Current Management Strategies: a Review.

Jordan Bauer, Joseph Duero, Adam Lindsay

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current osteoporosis reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jordan BauerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Connecticut, 120 Dowling Way, Farmington, CT, 06030, USA. jbauer@uchc.edu.
Joseph DueroUniversity of Connecticut School of Medicine, 200 Academic Way, Farmington, CT, 06032, USA.
Adam LindsayDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Connecticut, 120 Dowling Way, Farmington, CT, 06030, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis review provides a background on osteoporosis, describes the relationship between osteoporosis and periprosthetic fracture following total hip arthroplasty (THA), as well as to discusses current management strategies and future directions for improved patient outcomes. RECENT

findingsPeriprosthetic fracture of the hip is among one of the most common reasons for revision following THA and occurs in 0.1-3.5% of individuals. Periprosthetic fractures come with significant cost, morbidity, and future mortality. Risks for periprosthetic fractures following THA include female sex, older age, rheumatoid arthritis, and osteoporosis. Recent works have demonstrated that osteoporosis plays an important role in the rising prevalence of periprosthetic fractures following THA. This review characterizes the interplay between osteoporosis and periprosthetic hip fractures following THA with emphasis placed upon the pathophysiology of osteoporosis, the mechanisms by which osteoporosis promote periprosthetic fractures, management of such fractures, and the potential for future therapies.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipHip FracturesOsteoporosisPeriprosthetic FracturesHumansReoperationRisk FactorsOsteoporosisPeriprosthetic fractureTotal hip arthroplastyVancouver classification

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.