Trial reportSurgical endoscopy2025
Comparison of a novel endoscopic suturing device to conventional endoscopic suturing device in a validated simulator: a randomized, crossover study (with video).
Trial report in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsEndoscopic suturing using a conventional suturing device has a steep learning curve. This study assesses the ease of use of a novel endoscopic suturing system compared to the conventional device using a validated simulator.
methodsThis randomized, crossover study included suturing experts and novices performing pursestring suturing on a transoral outlet reduction simulator. Subjects were randomized to use the novel or conventional device first. Simulator scores and workload using National Aeronautical and Space Administration Task Load Index were recorded.
resultsTen subjects participated (4 experts, 6 novices). The novel device achieved higher simulator scores (179.3 ± 73.7 vs. 99.8 ± 94.1; P = 0.049) and lower workload (39.2 ± 15.9 vs. 70.5 ± 22.1; P = 0.002) than the conventional device. Novices demonstrated the greatest benefit.
conclusionThis novel endoscopic suturing system improves ease of use and reduces workload, especially in endoscopists without prior suturing experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40551028What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.