Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40550984›Full record

ArticleReproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)2025

Association Between Composite Dietary Antioxidant Index and Pregnancy: Insights from the NHANES.

Yi-Fan Kang, Jian-Rong Liu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yi-Fan KangThe Fifth Clinical Medical College of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Taiyuan, 030001, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2930-1280
Jian-Rong LiuShanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Taiyuan, 030001, China. liujianrong3@sina.com.ORCID 0000-0001-8163-7529

Funding

Key Laboratory in Science and Technology Development Project of Suzhou YDZJSX2022A069
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA substantial body of empirical evidence suggests that dietary antioxidants may play a critical role in promoting positive pregnancy outcomes. However, despite the well-documented benefits of individual antioxidants in reducing oxidative stress and associated complications, research investigating the association between overall antioxidant intake-quantified through the composite dietary antioxidant index (CDAI)-and pregnancy health remains scarce. This research fills a critical void by performing a cross-sectional evaluation based on data collected from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) covering the years 2007 to 2018. Through an in-depth assessment of the correlation between CDAI and maternal health outcomes, this study aims to offer fresh perspectives on the possible advantages of a well-rounded antioxidant intake throughout pregnancy.

methodsA weighted multiple logistic regression analysis was utilized to examine the relationship between CDAI and pregnancy outcomes, controlling for potential confounders. To further explore heterogeneity within the data, subgroup analyses were performed to identify population-specific variations in the observed associations. Additionally, non-linear trends were assessed using smoothing curve fitting techniques, allowing for a more comprehensive examination of potential complex relationships. To pinpoint threshold effects within the dataset, a segmented weighted linear regression model was employed, facilitating the identification of an inflection point where the nature or magnitude of the association may shift. This multi-faceted analytical approach ensures a robust evaluation of the impact of dietary antioxidant intake on pregnancy-related health outcomes.

resultsThe multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that higher levels of CDAI were significantly associated with an increased risk of infertility, after adjusting for various potential confounders. Specifically, individuals in the third quartile of CDAI (Q3) exhibited a 2.04-fold increase in the odds of infertility compared to those in the first quartile (OR 2.035, 95% CI 1.243-3.331, p = 0.00471), while those in the fourth quartile (Q4) faced a 3.58-fold greater risk (OR 3.581, 95% CI 2.249-5.700, p < 0.00001). These associations remained significant across subgroups differentiated by age, body mass index (BMI), educational attainment, and family income-to-poverty ratios.Additionally, when CDAI was treated as a continuous variable, a 0.1 unit increase was found to be associated with a more than 7% increase in the odds of achieving pregnancy (OR 1.076, 95% CI 1.042-1.110, p < 0.00001). This relationship highlights the potential impact of antioxidant consumption on reproductive health, indicating that higher antioxidant intake may enhance fertility outcomes. These findings warrant further investigation into the mechanisms by which antioxidants influence fertility, as well as potential public health recommendations for dietary interventions aimed at improving reproductive health.

conclusionsThis study elucidated a non-linear association between CDAI and pregnancy outcomes within a comprehensive, nationally representative cohort. The observed relationship suggests that the impact of antioxidant intake on reproductive health may vary at different levels of CDAI, indicating the presence of potential threshold effects. These findings highlight the intricate role of dietary antioxidants in pregnancy health and underscore the importance of further research to refine dietary guidelines aimed at optimizing reproductive outcomes.

Indexed as

AntioxidantsDietPregnancy OutcomeAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansNutrition SurveysPregnancyUnited StatesYoung AdultAntioxidantsCDAICross-sectional researchNHANESNon-linearPregnancy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.