ReviewNature human behaviour2025
How belief in conspiracy theories could harm sustainability.
Review in Nature human behaviour, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advice-taking in carbon footprint assessments: How psychological and cultural factors shape reliance on experts' advice.British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Previous research and theorizing have overwhelmingly focused on the psychological underpinnings of conspiracy beliefs. Here we examine what conspiracy beliefs imply for attitudes and behaviours relevant for the social, environmental and economic dimensions of sustainability. We propose that conspiracy beliefs mostly contribute negatively to sustainability, either by reducing sustainable attitudes and behaviours or by justifying (and thereby reinforcing) people's existing unsustainable attitudes and behaviours. Specifically, conspiracy beliefs are mostly associated with reduced public health and well-being, weakened social cohesion and deteriorated basic human rights (social sustainability); with lower support for reducing carbon emissions, investing in clean energy sources and preserving delicate ecosystems (environmental sustainability); and with reduced trust and cooperation, diminished support for technological innovation and increased harm to the international relationships necessary for fair trade (economic sustainability). However, most studies supporting these relationships were conducted in western democratic societies, underscoring a need for more cross-cultural research on these issues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40550915What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.