Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40550782›Full record

ArticleCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center

Assessing Sun Protection Policies in Texas School Districts Located in Counties With the Lowest and Highest Melanoma Risk: Content Analysis and Cross-Sectional Study.

Nabeel Ahmad, Brooke Bartley, Stephanie Zhang, Madison M Taylor, Karl Schrader, Kehe Zhang, Hung Quoc Doan, Cici Bauer, Kelly C Nelson, Jennifer Cofer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nabeel AhmadUniversity of Houston College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-2780-1022
Brooke BartleyTexas Health Presbyterian Dallas, Dallas, TX, USA.
Stephanie ZhangBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Madison M TaylorMcGovern Medical School at the University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-9493-2468
Karl SchraderRice University Houston, TX, USA.
Kehe ZhangDepartment of Biostatistics and Data Science, School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Hung Quoc DoanDepartment of Dermatology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Cici BauerDepartment of Biostatistics and Data Science, School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Kelly C NelsonDepartment of Dermatology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Jennifer CoferDepartment of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8910-5244

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

IntroductionSchool policy can encourage sun safe habits, such as wearing hats and applying sunscreen. However, sun safety policies (SSP) have not been formally assessed for Texas independent school districts (ISDs), particularly in counties with the highest melanoma incidence relative risk (RR). This study aims to assess the presence, strength, and intent of SSPs across Texas ISDs located in counties with the highest and lowest melanoma incidence. We also identify factors correlated with stronger SSP.MethodsEleven components of SSPs from 102 ISDs were evaluated in this cross-sectional study by examining school district websites, official documents, social media, media appearances, statements by school officials, and the Texas Education Agency's online database. Coders were trained to score each policy's content, presence, and strength.ResultsPolicies for sunscreen use and hats existed in 94% (n = 96) and 92% (n = 94) of ISDs, respectively. In counties with the highest melanoma incidence RR, 30% (n = 15) and 44% (n = 22) of ISDs allocated resources for sun safety and outdoor shade, compared to 2% (n = 1) and 3% (n = 2) in low-risk counties. No ISDs had SSPs on UV protective clothing, accountability, or modeling sun safety behaviors. SSP strength was positively correlated with percentage of school nurses (ρ = 0.564,

Indexed as

MelanomaSchoolsSkin NeoplasmsSunlightSunscreening AgentsChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleProtective ClothingRisk FactorsTexasSunscreening Agentsincidencemelanomarelative riskschoolschool districtsun protectionsun safety

Identifiers

PMID40550782
PMCPMC12185954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.