ReviewEuropean journal of haematology2025
Treatment-Free Remission in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Revisiting the "W" Questions.
Review in European journal of haematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Measurable Residual Disease and the Unresolved Biology of Leukemic Stem Cells.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2026Review
- Matching-adjusted indirect comparison between asciminib and flumatinib as first-line treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia in China.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Unmet needs and quality of life burden in chronic myeloid leukemia: results from a nationwide Italian real-world survey.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Treatment response and survival outcomes with BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitors in chronic myeloid leukemia: a retrospective study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Treatment-Free Remission in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Revisiting the "W" Questions.European journal of haematology · 2025Review
- Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors as Risk Factors for Cerebral Vascular Disease: Report of Two Cases and Literature Review.Case reports in neurological medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has undergone a transformation from a fatal disease to a chronic, manageable condition with the advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), particularly imatinib. This shift has significantly improved survival rates, and for some patients, achieving deep molecular response (DMR) has made treatment-free remission (TFR) a feasible goal. However, the ability to sustain TFR remains a challenge, primarily due to the persistence of leukemia stem cells (LSCs), which are inherently resistant to TKIs and contribute to relapse after treatment cessation. The barriers to TFR include not only the persistence of LSCs but also the complex biology of resistance mechanisms. Attempts to overcome these barriers through TKI rotation, second-generation TKIs, or strategies targeting the tumor microenvironment have shown limited success. Third-generation TKIs like ponatinib and novel agents such as asciminib and olverembatinib offer promising therapeutic alternatives, particularly for patients with the T315I mutation. However, their use is constrained by safety concerns and limited availability, especially in low-resource settings. Patient selection remains a crucial aspect of achieving TFR, as not all patients with DMR sustain remission after discontinuation of therapy. Factors such as age, immune profile, and measurable residual disease levels significantly influence relapse risk. Identifying reliable clinical and molecular predictors of successful TFR is essential for optimizing treatment strategies and improving outcomes. The concept of the "W" questions-who, when, why, what, and where-frames the future of TFR in CML. Who should be selected for TFR? When should TFR be pursued? Why are some patients successful in achieving and sustaining TFR, while others relapse? What strategies can enhance the likelihood of TFR success, such as novel therapies, combination treatments, and patient-specific approaches? Where should these strategies be implemented to ensure equitable access, particularly in resource-limited settings? This review highlights the progress made in CML treatment, emphasizes the need for precision medicine to personalize TFR strategies, and stresses the importance of answering the fundamental "W" questions to advance the field. Future research must focus on refining predictive models, exploring new therapeutic options, and expanding access to treatments to ensure equitable benefits for all CML patients globally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.