ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2025
SITC perspective: leveraging patient enrichment biomarkers to accelerate early phase IO drug development.
Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Article
- Causal AI for cancer immunotherapy: a narrative framework review of target trial emulation, treatment-effect learning and clinical translation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Harnessing cellular immunotherapy for cholangiocarcinoma: an integrated roadmap for overcoming resistance.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Advances and obstacles of T cell-based immunotherapy in gynecological malignancies.Molecular cancer · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer immunotherapy (IO) enables patients to live well with cancer for many years, or even be cured. Several investigational IO agents recently failed in early-phase or late-phase trials, leading some to doubt the future of IO. Patient heterogeneity (eg, tumor characteristics, treatment history) increases the risk that a clinically active IO drug might be discarded. Enriching enrollment for patients with biomarkers hypothesized to reflect a higher probability of clinical benefit across clinical development should mitigate this risk. The Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer convened diverse IO stakeholders to discuss leveraging biomarkers at the earliest stages of drug development to accelerate the delivery of innovative IO agents to patients. This group developed a framework based on a biomarker-based enrichment strategy in early trials that evolves into the development of more precise predictive biomarkers in late phase trials. This framework integrates mechanistic insights related to the drug and its impact on the tumor microenvironment derived from preclinical data, digital pathology, exploratory multiomics, and artificial intelligence that are continuously refined through both adaptive and randomized clinical trials. Biomarker-based enrichment in early clinical development should de-risk late-stage trials, ultimately expanding the portfolio of innovative IO drugs available to patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.