ArticleInternational journal of laboratory hematology2025
How Trustworthy is Light Transmittance Platelet Aggregometry With Low Platelet Count Samples? Insights From Test Replicates and Retrospective Analysis of Several Decades of Diagnostic Samples.
Article in International journal of laboratory hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Investigator-Led Research to Improve the Diagnostic Assessment of Platelet Function Disorders: Reflections on the Challenges and Rewards.International journal of laboratory hematology · 2026Review
- How Trustworthy is Light Transmittance Platelet Aggregometry With Low Platelet Count Samples? Insights From Test Replicates and Retrospective Analysis of Several Decades of Diagnostic Samples.International journal of laboratory hematology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionLight transmission platelet aggregometry (LTA) is useful to diagnose platelet function disorders (PFD). We evaluated the precision and reproducibility of LTA with low platelet count platelet-rich plasma (LPRP).
methodsLPRP maximal aggregation (MA) precision for informative agonists and LTA reproducibility were assessed using multiple replicates for adjusted control LPRP (CLPRP) and retrospective analysis of several decades of consecutive patient LPRP (PLPRP) and CLPRP tests with replicates between and/or within tests.
resultsIntra-subject CLPRP had acceptable MA CVs and tracings unless platelets were ≤ 25 × 10
conclusionsDiagnostic LTA with LPRP has acceptable precision and reproducibility when evaluated with informative agonists. Nonetheless, caution is warranted when testing samples with ≤ 25 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.