Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40550213›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurosurgery. Case lessons2025

Simultaneous two-level minimally invasive lumbar laminectomy performed with dual tubular retractor systems in a 93-year-old under spinal anesthesia: illustrative case.

Parker R Buck, Jean-Paul Bryant, Jeffrey J Stewart, Dhiraj Jagasia, Jean-Marc Voyadzis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Parker R BuckDepartment of Neurosurgery, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC.
Jean-Paul BryantDepartment of Neurosurgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC.
Jeffrey J StewartDepartment of Neurosurgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC.
Dhiraj JagasiaDepartment of Anesthesiology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC.
Jean-Marc VoyadzisDepartment of Neurosurgery, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLumbar spinal stenosis is a common degenerative condition in elderly patients that often requires surgical intervention. Minimally invasive techniques combined with spinal anesthesia (SA) can reduce patient complications and improve outcomes. Here the authors present the case of an elderly patient who underwent minimally invasive surgery, using dual tubular retractors and SA to address severe lumbar stenosis. OBSERVATIONS: A 93-year-old female presented with severe back pain radiating bilaterally to her lower extremities. MRI demonstrated severe central canal stenosis at L4-5 and severe left lateral recess stenosis at L5-S1. Under SA, the patient underwent both L4 and L5 laminectomies simultaneously with two surgeons using dual tubular retractors. The patient was ambulatory within 4 hours of surgery with complete symptom resolution. LESSONS: SA can be utilized safely during spinal surgery in the geriatric population. The use of dual tubular retractors by two surgeons working simultaneously allows for a safe and efficient decompression of stenosis at multiple levels. Dual tubular retractors can safely be used in conjunction with SA to achieve maximal benefit to the patient and surgical efficiency. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE2521.

Indexed as

dual tubular retractorslumbar spinal stenosisminimally invasive surgeryspinal anesthesiaspine surgery

Identifiers

PMID40550213
PMCPMC12184524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.