ArticleJMIR pediatrics and parenting2025
COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake, Sources of Information and Side Effects Reported by Pregnant Women in Western Australia: Cross-Sectional Cohort Survey.
Article in JMIR pediatrics and parenting, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pregnant women are a priority group for COVID-19 vaccination due to their vulnerability as a high-risk cohort. However, the currentCOVID-19 vaccine uptake rate for COVID-19 vaccination among pregnant women in Western Australia remains largely unknown. Objective: This study aimed to explore pregnant women's vaccination uptake rates, information sources, and experiences regarding COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy. We hypothesized that uptake of vaccination among pregnant women is higher than indicated in previous studies, given differences in disease burden and public health restrictions at the time when data was collected. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was administered electronically to maternity patients at a single tertiary metropolitan hospital in Perth, Western Australia. Results: A total of 520 women participated in the study. Overall, the antenatal COVID-19 vaccination rate was 79% (n=398). Approximately, 51% (n=256) of the women felt well-informed about the vaccine, and information was sourced primarily from their general practitioner (n=301, 60%), midwives (n=174, 35%), and obstetric doctors (n=64, 13%). Compared to Caucasian women, those of non-Caucasian ethnicity (n=332, 66% vs n=170, 34%; P=.07) and those born outside Australia (n=235, 47%) reported lower rates of vaccine information provision by the hospital staff (n=22, 34% vs n=42, 66%; P=.04). Conclusions: The COVID-19 vaccine uptake among pregnant women was encouragingly high in our study, with favorable attitudes and acceptance for the vaccine observed in the majority of pregnant women. This self-reported study also identified opportunities for enhanced cultural competence and further education and training for hospital staff regarding COVID-19 vaccine information provision to ethnically diverse women. Further studies examining such interventions are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.