ArticleJournal of cataract and refractive surgery2025
Haptics and axis stability of customized vertical implantable collamer lens implantation.
Article in Journal of cataract and refractive surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluating Rotational Stability of the Visian V4b TICL in Patients with High Myopic Astigmatism.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the postoperative vault, haptic position, and axis stability of vertical implantable collamer lens (ICL) implantation.
settingFudan University Eye and ENT Hospital, Shanghai, China.
designProspective.
methodsThis study included patients who underwent ICL implantation. 3 months postoperatively, the vault, haptic position, and axis were measured.
results98 eyes from 98 patients were included. At 3 months postoperatively, the vault was 517.10 ± 200.08 μm in the vertical group and 506.88 ± 204.19 μm in the horizontal group ( P = .803). There was a significant difference in the distribution of haptics in the ciliary sulcus between the 2 groups ( P = .045). In the vertical group, a mean of 0.90 ± 0.83 haptics near the incision and 1.33 ± 0.81 haptics away from the incision were located in the sulcus, showing a significant difference ( P = .002). In those undergoing toric ICL implantation, 54% of eyes in the vertical group and 79% in the horizontal group experienced rotation, with a significant difference ( P = .042). In the horizontal group, there were significant differences in both the vault and difference value between vertical and horizontal sulcus-to-sulcus diameter (vSTS - hSTS) between the nonrotated and rotated subgroups ( P = .019 and P = .035, respectively).
conclusionsCustomized vertical ICL implantation does not affect refractive outcomes and achieves an ideal vault. Situating the haptic near the incision in the ciliary sulcus is relatively more difficult for vertical implantation. Vertical implantation improves ICL stability in patients with a large vSTS - hSTS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.