Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40549819›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2025

Community-based surveillance of Chagas Disease: Characterization and use of Triatomine Information Posts (TIPs) in a high-risk area for triatomine reinfestation in Latin America.

Valéria Carla Faria Amaral, Millena Vieira Simões de Freitas, Gustavo Libério de Paulo, Silvia Ermelinda Barbosa, Janice Maria Borba de Souza, Bruno Silva Amaral, Liléia Gonçalves Diotaiuti, Raquel Aparecida Ferreira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. New technologies for identification and surveillance of Chagas disease vectors.Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Valéria Carla Faria AmaralGrupo de pesquisa Triatomíneos, Instituto René Rachou, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Millena Vieira Simões de FreitasGrupo de pesquisa Triatomíneos, Instituto René Rachou, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Gustavo Libério de PauloInstituto Geociências, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Silvia Ermelinda BarbosaGrupo de pesquisa Triatomíneos, Instituto René Rachou, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Janice Maria Borba de SouzaGrupo de pesquisa Triatomíneos, Instituto René Rachou, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Bruno Silva AmaralGrupo de pesquisa Triatomíneos, Instituto René Rachou, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Liléia Gonçalves DiotaiutiGrupo de pesquisa Triatomíneos, Instituto René Rachou, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Raquel Aparecida FerreiraGrupo de pesquisa Triatomíneos, Instituto René Rachou, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1059-7886

Funding

IRR/FIOCRUZPrograma de Pesquisa para o SUS, 2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Brazil, vector surveillance with public participation is a prioritized action in the primary prevention of Chagas Disease (CD). It is anchored in the implementation of Triatomine Information Posts (TIPs), spaces recognized by health surveillance for receiving insects suspected of being triatomines. For the first time in the scientific literature, a study is dedicated to characterizing TIPs operationally, structurally, and functionally, as well as understanding the factors that hinder their sustainability. METHODOLOGY: The study was conducted in one of the most vulnerable regions for CD in the Americas. Using mixed approaches applied to health, an electronic form was sent to the municipal coordinators of endemic diseases to characterize the implementation, operational status, and description of TIPs. Data from an information system were accessed to analyze their productivity. Lastly, five focus groups were conducted to capture the perception of the endemic disease coordinators regarding TIPs. PRINCIPAL

findings100% of the municipalities did not maintain documentary records of the use and productivity of TIPs, 40% of municipalities had never implemented a TIP; of those implemented, more than 30% were deactivated, with a significant portion located in rural areas. TIPs located in areas shared with Primary Health Care facilities showed lower deactivation rates. Key factors hindering the functioning and sustainability of TIPs included the population's lack of awareness about them, the need for increased publicity of these locations, a shortage of qualified professionals, TIP distribution in hard-to-access areas, and the absence of feedback on insect examinations to residents. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: A scenario of heterogeneous distribution was revealed in the implementation/functioning of TIPs, as well as low public engagement and usage. There is an urgent need for health systems to be organized to regulate surveillance with public participation and to conduct awareness campaigns aimed at preventing future household reinfestations by triatomines and the resurgence of CD transmission in endemic areas.

Indexed as

Chagas DiseaseEpidemiological MonitoringInsect VectorsTriatominaeAnimalsBrazilHumansInsect ControlLatin America

Identifiers

PMID40549819
PMCPMC12208441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.