ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2025
Community-based surveillance of Chagas Disease: Characterization and use of Triatomine Information Posts (TIPs) in a high-risk area for triatomine reinfestation in Latin America.
Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Landscape modeling as a surveillance strategy for Trypanosoma cruzi vectors in Brazil.Parasites & vectors · 2026Article
- New technologies for identification and surveillance of Chagas disease vectors.Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical · 2026Review
- Chagas Disease in the 21st Century: Global Spread, Ecological Shifts, and Research Frontiers.Biology · 2025Review
- Deforestation effects and house invasion by chagas disease vectors in Brazil.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn Brazil, vector surveillance with public participation is a prioritized action in the primary prevention of Chagas Disease (CD). It is anchored in the implementation of Triatomine Information Posts (TIPs), spaces recognized by health surveillance for receiving insects suspected of being triatomines. For the first time in the scientific literature, a study is dedicated to characterizing TIPs operationally, structurally, and functionally, as well as understanding the factors that hinder their sustainability. METHODOLOGY: The study was conducted in one of the most vulnerable regions for CD in the Americas. Using mixed approaches applied to health, an electronic form was sent to the municipal coordinators of endemic diseases to characterize the implementation, operational status, and description of TIPs. Data from an information system were accessed to analyze their productivity. Lastly, five focus groups were conducted to capture the perception of the endemic disease coordinators regarding TIPs. PRINCIPAL
findings100% of the municipalities did not maintain documentary records of the use and productivity of TIPs, 40% of municipalities had never implemented a TIP; of those implemented, more than 30% were deactivated, with a significant portion located in rural areas. TIPs located in areas shared with Primary Health Care facilities showed lower deactivation rates. Key factors hindering the functioning and sustainability of TIPs included the population's lack of awareness about them, the need for increased publicity of these locations, a shortage of qualified professionals, TIP distribution in hard-to-access areas, and the absence of feedback on insect examinations to residents. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: A scenario of heterogeneous distribution was revealed in the implementation/functioning of TIPs, as well as low public engagement and usage. There is an urgent need for health systems to be organized to regulate surveillance with public participation and to conduct awareness campaigns aimed at preventing future household reinfestations by triatomines and the resurgence of CD transmission in endemic areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.