Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40549808›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2025

Foveal neurons of the monkey superior colliculus signal trans-saccadic prediction errors.

Tong Zhang, Amarender R Bogadhi, Ziad M Hafed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tong ZhangWerner Reichardt Centre for Integrative Neuroscience, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Amarender R BogadhiWerner Reichardt Centre for Integrative Neuroscience, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Ziad M HafedWerner Reichardt Centre for Integrative Neuroscience, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9968-119X

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG; German Research Foundation)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Across saccades, neurons in retinotopically organized visual representations experience drastically different images, but visual percepts remain stable. Here we investigated whether such stability can be mediated, in part, via prediction-error signaling by neurons processing post-saccadic visual images. We specifically recorded from foveal superior colliculus (SC) neurons when a visual image only overlapped with their response fields (RF's) after foveating saccades but not pre-saccadically. When we rapidly changed the target features intra-saccadically, the foveal neurons' post-saccadic visual reafferent responses were elevated, even though the neurons did not directly sample the pre-saccadic extrafoveal target features. This effect did not occur in the absence of saccades, and it also scaled with the extent of the introduced intra-saccadic image feature discrepancies. These results suggest that foveal SC neurons may signal a trans-saccadic prediction error when the foveated image stimulating them is inconsistent with that expected from pre-saccadic extrafoveal representations, a potential perceptual stability mechanism.

Indexed as

Fovea CentralisNeuronsSaccadesSuperior ColliculiAnimalsMacaca mulattaMalePhotic StimulationVisual FieldsVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID40549808
PMCPMC12212877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.