Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40549799›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Infected connections: Unraveling the impact of a bacterial symbiont on ant-aphid partnership.

Margaux Jossart, Thierry Hance, Claire Detrain

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Margaux JossartUnit of Social Ecology, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0009-0003-1756-6203
Thierry HanceEarth and Life Institute, Biodiversity Research Center, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Claire DetrainUnit of Social Ecology, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The multitrophic plant-aphid-ant system is a model widely studied in ecology and evolutionary biology. Within this system, bacterial symbionts can circulate and may modify the relationships between partners. A common symbiont of aphids, Serratia symbiotica, shows a wide variety of strains with different lifestyles, one of them being associated with the aphid gut and found in the digestive tract of aphid-tending ants. This free-living S. symbiotica strain induces fitness costs on its aphid host which can be offset by a lower selective pressure exerted by parasitoids. In this paper, we investigated whether this aphid gut-associated bacterium may alter the mutualistic relationships between Aphis fabae aphids and Lasius niger ants. Aphids infected with S. symbiotica showed a reduced population growth, this negative effect being attenuated in the presence of aphid-tending ants. This bacterium also reduced the ant interest in honeydew-producing aphids: they were less likely to visit plants bearing S. symbiotica-infected aphids, they ingested fewer honeydew droplets and they took a longer time before deciding to feed on released honeydew. The bacterium thus makes honeydew less palatable for ant foragers, most probably by altering its composition. This suggests that the free-living S. symbiotica strain may promote a gradual abandonment of infected aphids by ants and ultimately jeopardize the ant-aphid mutualistic relationship. We speculate about bacteria-induced consequences of reduced ant protection against aphid natural enemies and increased host plant defense as due to a potential redirection of ant foraging towards extrafloral nectaries as an alternative sugar resource.

Indexed as

AntsAphidsSerratiaSymbiosisAnimals

Identifiers

PMID40549799
PMCPMC12184899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.