ArticlePLOS global public health2025
Association between Charlson Comorbidity Index and positive blood cultures at a tertiary-care hospital in Indonesia.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Blood culture (BC) tests are a scarce resource in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs); therefore, prioritization based on likelihood of positive results might be beneficial. We aimed to determine whether comorbidities in the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) were associated with positive BC tests among patients with suspected hospital-acquired bacteremia. We analysed a retrospective cohort from health records at Dr. Wahidin Sudirohusodo Hospital, Makassar, Indonesia from 2015-2018. We applied multivariable logistic regression to identify associations between CCI score and the outcome of the first BC taken two calendar days after admission, adjusting for confounders. The primary analysis considered BCs positive for all pathogens. Of 3,875 adult patients who had their first BCs taken two calendar days after hospital admissions, 786 (20.3%) had their first BCs positive for any pathogen. Those included 371 patients who had their first BCs positive for Staphylococcus aureus (n = 133; 35.9%), Acinetobacter spp. (n = 84; 22.6%), Klebsiella. pneumoniae (n = 58; 15.6%), Escherichia coli (n = 63; 17.0%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 33; 8.9%). There was no association between increasing CCI score and positive BC (OR 1.01, 95%CI: 0.96-1.06, p = 0.69) after adjustment for age, sex and other potential confounders. There was some indication that antibiotic use prior to BC test acted as an effect modifier between CCI score and positivity of BC (p = 0.17). In this single-hospital study, no significant association was observed between CCI score and positive BC taken two calendar days after hospital admission. We suggest that other factors need to be investigated to guide BC testing, and that improving diagnostic and antibiotic stewardship, including increasing resources for BC testing prior to antibiotics among hospitalized patients are needed in LMICs.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.