ArticlePloS one2025
Effect of altered gluteus maximus strength on the magnitude and direction of hip joint contact forces during simulations of gait.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Statistical nonParametric Mapping Enables Rigorous Comparison of Collagen Fibril Diameter Distributions.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome (FAIS), a common and painful hip condition that affects active young adults, is associated with muscle weakness and altered movement patterns during common daily activities. FAIS is believed to be a precursor to osteoarthritis through disrupted loading patterns; thus, understanding how weakness affects joint loading may provide insights into the pathogenesis from FAIS to osteoarthritis. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of gluteus maximus strength on hip joint contact forces during gait using musculoskeletal modeling. Twelve individuals with FAIS and 13 healthy controls were included in the study and five conditions of gluteus maximus strength (50%, 75%, 100%, 125%, and 150% of the model's default strength) were examined. Differences in the magnitude of the resultant joint contact force and directional components of the joint contact force between groups (FAIS vs controls) and between strength conditions were assessed with statistical nonparametric mapping. Joint contact forces were also used to determine the direction of hip loading in the sagittal and frontal planes and the center of the loading area was compared between groups and between strength conditions using independent t-tests and repeated measures analysis of variance, respectively. Joint contact force magnitude and direction did not differ between FAIS and control groups, aside from a brief period of larger medial force in the FAIS group. With both groups combined for remaining analyses, magnitude and direction of the joint contact force changed with the varied strength conditions; specifically, the 50 and 75% strength conditions demonstrated a lower magnitude joint contact force with a more anterior and medial direction. Importantly, these changes were small and of questionable clinical value. Future investigations should model movement changes alongside strength changes and use magnetic resonance imaging to examine a mechanistic link between load and intraarticular joint health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.