ArticlePLOS digital health2025
Machine learning-based equations for improved body composition estimation in Indian adults.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing the accuracy of bioimpedance-derived appendicular skeletal muscle mass in aged adults through machine learning.European geriatric medicine · 2026Article
- Metrology in Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA): From Measurement Science to Clinical and Research Applications.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Anthropometric Measurements for Predicting Low Appendicular Lean Mass Index for the Diagnosis of Sarcopenia: A Machine Learning Model.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2025Article
- Body composition measures assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in a sample of Brazilian adults and older adults.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is commonly used as a lower-cost measurement of body composition as compared to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in large-scale epidemiological studies. However, existing equations for body composition based on BIA measures may not generalize well to all populations. We combined BIA measurements (TANITA BC-418) with skinfold thickness, body circumferences, and grip strength to develop equations to predict six DXA-measured body composition parameters in a cohort of Indian adults using machine learning techniques. The participants were split into training (80%, 1297 males and 1133 females) and testing (20%, 318 males and 289 females) data to develop and validate the performance of equations for total body fat mass (kg), total body lean mass (kg), total body fat percentage (%), trunk fat percentage (%), L1-L4 fat percentage (%), and total appendicular lean mass (kg), separately for males and females. Our novel equations outperformed existing equations for each of these body composition parameters. For example, the mean absolute error for total body fat mass was 1.808 kg for males and 2.054 kg for females using the TANITA's built-in estimation algorithm, 2.105 kg for males and 2.995 kg for females using Durnin-Womersley equations, and 0.935 kg for males and 0.976 kg for females using our novel equations. Our findings demonstrate that supplementing body composition estimates from BIA devices with simple anthropometric measures can greatly improve the validity of BIA-measured body composition in South Asians. This approach could be extended to other BIA devices and populations to improve the performance of BIA devices. Our equations are made available for use by other researchers.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.