ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2025
Using Computer Vision Libraries to Streamline Nuclei Quantification.
Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Live cell assays and image-based cell analyses require data normalization for accurate interpretation. A commonly used method is to stain and quantify nuclei, followed by data normalization to nuclei count. This nuclei count is often expressed as cell count for uninucleate cells. While manual quantification can be laborious and time-consuming, available automated methods may not be preferred by all users, may lack validation for this specific application, or may be cost-prohibitive. Here, we provide step-by-step instructions for capturing quantifiable images of nuclei stained with fluorescent DNA stains and subsequently quantifying the nuclei using an automated object counting software program developed using Python computer vision libraries. We also validate this program across a range of cell densities. Although the exact time for program execution varies based on the number of images and computer hardware, this program consolidates hours of work counting nuclei into seconds for the program to run. While this protocol was developed using images of fixed, stained cells, images of stained nuclei in live cells and immunofluorescence applications can also be quantified using this program. Ultimately, this program provides an option that does not require a high degree of technological skill and is a validated, open-source alternative to aid cell and molecular biologists in streamlining their workflows, automating the tedious and time-consuming task of nuclei quantification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.