Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40549431›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025

Spread and Scale-Up of a Region-Wide Telehealth Navigation Service in a Rural Context: Qualitative Process Evaluation.

Mary Malakellis, Anna Wong Shee, Laura Alston, Vincent L Versace, Pheona Griffith, Jade Odgers, Kevin Mc Namara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mary MalakellisDeakin Rural Health, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Warrnambool, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2063-2040
Anna Wong SheeDeakin Rural Health, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Warrnambool, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5095-218X
Laura AlstonDeakin Rural Health, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Warrnambool, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4551-8845
Vincent L VersaceDeakin Rural Health, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Warrnambool, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8514-1763
Pheona GriffithGrampians Health, Ballarat, Australia.ORCID 0009-0008-7294-7435
Jade OdgersGrampians Health, Ballarat, Australia.ORCID 0009-0002-9908-1367
Kevin Mc NamaraDeakin Rural Health, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Warrnambool, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6547-9153

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFew evaluations of interventions adapted or developed for a rural context have been conducted, and little is known about how to spread and scale up interventions from a metropolitan to a rural context. Similarly, evidence on implementation processes for interventions to address people with frequent potentially avoidable presentations (hereafter referred to as frequent presenters) to the emergency department is scarce in rural settings. In this study, Patient Watch, a telehealth case management program modeled on a metropolitan service, was implemented in a rural context to support frequent presenters.

objectiveThis study aims to understand the spread, scale-up, and sustainability of Patient Watch in a rural context to inform the potential for transferability to other contexts.

methodsThe study design was a qualitative process evaluation, collecting and synthesizing data obtained from semistructured interviews (n=10) with stakeholders, including executives, managers, physicians, and frontline staff; document review, including steering committee meeting minutes (n=17) and other relevant documents (eg, planning documents, workflow plans, consumer information, and standard operating procedures; n=20); observation of steering committee meetings of 1-hour duration (n=11); and 1 on-site visit with the Patient Watch team at the lead agency. The data were categorized into themes using thematic analysis.

resultsThree themes were constructed from the data: (1) health care system complexity, (2) context drives adaptation and innovation, and (3) autonomy. Preexisting health system factors, including financial resources, workforce constraints, and infrastructure challenges, influenced organizational capacity to scale-up Patient Watch. Continuous adaptation in response to health system factors was essential for tailoring Patient Watch. Local autonomy facilitated adaptation to address variations across local contexts; however, restrictive governance impeded the ability to respond to local challenges.

conclusionsOur findings emphasized how rural contextual factors influenced the spread, scale-up, and future sustainability of Patient Watch and provided a greater understanding of implementing and adapting a metropolitan model in a rural context. Future research should acknowledge health system complexity; prioritize ongoing adaptations in various contexts; and integrate a balance of distributed leadership to improve the spread, scale-up, and sustainability of telehealth case management interventions.

Indexed as

Patient NavigationRural Health ServicesTelemedicineCase ManagementHumansQualitative ResearchRural Populationcase managementfrequent presentershealth servicesimplementationruraltelehealth

Identifiers

PMID40549431
PMCPMC12235203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.