Trial reportInflammopharmacology2025
The potential impact of clindamycin on neurosurgery patients: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Inflammopharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Consciousness Disturbances Reported With Clindamycin Versus Cefazolin in Surgical Patients: A Global Pharmacovigilance Analysis Using VigiBase.Clinical and translational science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe study investigates whether adding clindamycin to neurosurgery patients' as a postsurgical management regimen improves recovery, provides neuroprotection, and prevents neurological complications. Neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and neurotensin (NT) were measured as biomarkers of inflammation, brain damage, and neuronal apoptosis.
methodsPatients were randomly assigned into two groups (n = 22 each) to receive the standard management plus either ceftriaxone (2 g / 12 h) or plus ceftriaxone and clindamycin (900 mg/8 h) as a combination therapy for seven days.
resultsNSE serum levels in the clindamycin and control group on day 3 were (10.01 ± 1.64) versus (23.77 ± 11.75), respectively (p = 0.0001). NT serum levels in the clindamycin and control groups on day 3 were (4.5 ± 2.8) versus (8.29 ± 7.97), respectively (p = 0.0418). Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) on day 3 was (14.32 ± 1.13) versus (14.23 ± 1.31) in the clindamycin and the control groups, respectively, (p = 0.724). SOFA score assessed on day 3 (5 (22.7%)) and (1 (4.5%)) had grade 1, (15 (68.25)) and (14 (63.35)) had grade 2, (1 (4.5%)) and (5 (22.7%)) had grade 3, (0 (0.0%)) and (1 (4.5%)) had grade 4, and (1 (4.5%)) and (1 (4.5%)) had grade 5 in the clindamycin and control groups, respectively.
conclusionAdjunctive use of clindamycin might be a novel option that reduces secondary neurological injury/damage after neurosurgeries. Further and more extensive clinical trials are warranted to confirm the findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.