ArticleMycopathologia2025
Aspergillosis on YouTube: Assessment of Quality and Reliability of Uploaded Videos.
Article in Mycopathologia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Stratified and combined analysis of the quality of lumbar spinal stenosis-related videos on major Chinese short video platforms.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAspergillosis, a fungal disease caused by the genus Aspergillus, can lead to various clinical manifestations, especially in immunocompromised individuals. YouTube serves as a major source of health information, but the quality and reliability of its content vary. We evaluated the quality, reliability, and educational value of uploaded YouTube videos on aspergillosis.
methodsOn August 20th, 2024, YouTube Videos on aspergillosis were selected based on the number of views and analyzed using the Global Quality Score (GQS), Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Benchmark Criteria, and the Modified DISCERN Questionnaire. Videos were categorized by creators (Doctors, Medical tutors, Patients, Others). Descriptive statistics, Mann-Whitney U test, and Spearman correlation were used to assess video quality and its association with video parameters.
resultsWe included 50 videos, which generally exhibited high content quality with a median GQS of 4.00 (IQR = 0.50), good information quality with a JAMA median score of 3.00 (IQR = 0.75), and moderate reliability with mDISCERN median score of 3.40 (IQR = 1.00). Significant positive correlations were found between video duration and GQS (r = 0.592, p < 0.001), JAMA (r = 0.308, p = 0.031), and mDISCERN (r = 0.667, p < 0.001). High-quality videos had significantly longer durations, with a median of 12.97 min (IQR = 16.57) compared to low-to-medium-quality videos with 2.00 min (IQR = 5.57) (p < 0.001).
conclusionThere is a significant variability in the quality of videos on aspergillosis on YouTube. While longer videos tend to offer more reliable and comprehensive information, relying on popularity metrics alone may lead to misinformation. There is a need for critical evaluation of online information on this important fungal disease and the promotion of high-quality content to enhance public understanding and health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40549256What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.