Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40549245›Full record

ArticleRadiological physics and technology2025

Clinical technique: evaluation of detection accuracy in surface-guided radiation therapy using CT references from different treatment planning systems.

Masahide Saito, Koji Ueda, Hikaru Nemoto, Ryota Tozuka, Yosuke Miyasaka, Yoshiko Onishi, Syuichiro Sugiyama, Yumi Sasada, Naoki Sano, Hiroshi Onishi

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Masahide SaitoDepartment of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, 1110 Shimokato, Chuo-City, Yamanashi, 409-3898, Japan. masahides@yamanashi.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8636-4045
Koji UedaDepartment of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, 1110 Shimokato, Chuo-City, Yamanashi, 409-3898, Japan.
Hikaru NemotoDepartment of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, 1110 Shimokato, Chuo-City, Yamanashi, 409-3898, Japan.
Ryota TozukaDepartment of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, 1110 Shimokato, Chuo-City, Yamanashi, 409-3898, Japan.
Yosuke MiyasakaDepartment of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, 1110 Shimokato, Chuo-City, Yamanashi, 409-3898, Japan.
Yoshiko OnishiDepartment of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, 1110 Shimokato, Chuo-City, Yamanashi, 409-3898, Japan.
Syuichiro SugiyamaDepartment of Radiological Technology, Shizuoka General Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan.
Yumi SasadaDepartment of Radiological Technology, Shizuoka General Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan.
Naoki SanoDepartment of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, 1110 Shimokato, Chuo-City, Yamanashi, 409-3898, Japan.
Hiroshi OnishiDepartment of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, 1110 Shimokato, Chuo-City, Yamanashi, 409-3898, Japan.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 22K15823
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluated the detection accuracy of the VOXELAN surface-guided radiation therapy (SGRT) system using CT reference body surfaces generated by different radiation treatment planning systems (RTPSs) under their respective default CT value threshold settings. Two phantoms were used to assess 6-axis position matching accuracy with 1 mm and 2 mm slice thicknesses. Contour variations of approximately 2 mm were observed in the ventral and dorsal directions due to differing RTPSs. VOXELAN generally achieved detection accuracy within 1 mm, though some RTPS combinations showed errors exceeding 1 mm in the longitudinal and lateral directions. Slice thickness differences had minimal impact on detection accuracy. Overall, VOXELAN's detection accuracy varied slightly depending on the RTPS used but remained within approximately 1 mm. From our results, using a consistent RTPS when performing SGRT is recommended, as detection errors associated with different RTPS combinations were complex and difficult to interpret.

Indexed as

Radiotherapy, Image-GuidedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray ComputedHumansPhantoms, ImagingReference StandardsCT referenceDICOM referenceSGRTTreatment planning system

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.