Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40549225›Full record

ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2025

Update on paraproteinemic neuropathy.

Rebecca Traub, Samuel M Rubinstein, Christopher Dittus

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rebecca TraubUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, 170 Manning Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7025, USA. rtraub@neurology.unc.edu.
Samuel M RubinsteinUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, 170 Manning Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7025, USA.
Christopher DittusUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, 170 Manning Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7025, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis article reviews recent clinical updates and research on the evaluation and management of patients with peripheral neuropathy in association with monoclonal gammopathies. RECENT

findingsRecent studies have elucidated pathogenic mechanisms of IgM paraprotein associated neuropathies, including nodal and paranodal targets and complement mediated processes, suggesting novel therapeutic targets. New chemotherapeutic regimens have improved outcomes and neurotoxic side effect profiles in the treatment of patients with light chain (AL) amyloidosis and POEMS syndrome. Establishing when a monoclonal gammopathy is causative of a peripheral neuropathy remains a clinical challenge. New therapeutic drugs for treatment of IgM paraprotein associated neuropathies show promise. Identifying AL amyloidosis and POEMS early in patients presenting with neuropathy are important. Clinical phenotyping and antibody testing are critical to evaluating patients with paraproteins and peripheral neuropathy.

Indexed as

ParaproteinemiasPeripheral Nervous System DiseasesHumansPOEMS SyndromeAnti-MAG antibody neuropathyMonoclonal gammopathyMonoclonal gammopathy of neurological significanceParaneoplastic neuropathyParaprotein

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.