Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40549213›Full record

SynthesisArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2025

Outcomes following planned two-stage exchange arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infections in the United States: a systematic review of the literature.

Nicolas Piuzzi, Larry Yost, William Putnam, Bryan Springer, Brian de Beaubien, Kenneth Urish, Javad Parvizi

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nicolas PiuzziDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, USA. piuzzin@ccf.org.
Larry YostThe Atticus Group, Portsmouth, USA.
William PutnamOsteal Therapeutics, Dallas, USA.
Bryan SpringerDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA.
Brian de BeaubienDepartment of Orthopedics, Covenant Medical Center, Lubbock, USA.
Kenneth UrishDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA.
Javad ParviziInternational Joint Center, Acıbadem University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWhile two-stage exchange arthroplasty is the gold standard for treating periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs), it results in a prolonged treatment period with the potential for complications and non-planned additional procedures, limited joint function during the interstage period, and emotional stress for patients. The primary objective of this systematic literature review was to evaluate outcomes associated with two-stage exchange arthroplasty for treating total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) PJIs. This literature review analyzed U.S. data on the timing and health consequences associated with the interstage period and outcomes following reimplantation in patients undergoing two-stage exchange arthroplasty. MATERIALS AND

methodsA search of U.S. studies published between January 2014 and January 2024 was conducted using PubMed and Embase databases.

resultsSixty-five studies reporting data on 26,354 patients undergoing two-stage exchange arthroplasty were included. There were 29.0% and 68.6% of patients who underwent THA and TKA respectively, with 2.4% patients not having the affecting joint identified. The mean interstage period was 141.4 ± 74.2 days with 16.9 ± 12.2% patients not re-implanted. The mean infection eradication was 74.2 ± 10.5% and the average reinfection rate was 15.7 ± 7.1%. Complications and additional procedures were common during the interstage and post-implant periods. Only four studies utilized Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) Outcomes Reporting Tool. Patients undergoing treatment for TKA PJIs had less successful MSIS outcomes compared to those being treated for THA PJIs. This includes a lower rate of infection control (46.0% vs. 65.5%), a higher rate of reoperation, revision, and/or spacer retention (40.6% vs. 25.2%) and a higher death rate (13.4% vs. 9.4%), respectively.

conclusionTwo-stage exchange arthroplasty treatment of PJIs is associated with major morbidity and often requires additional surgical procedures to address complications. The prolonged duration of the interstage period contributes to morbidity and negatively impacts patients' quality of life and increases the risk of mortality.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeProsthesis-Related InfectionsReoperationHumansTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesPeriprosthetic joint infectionTotal hip arthroplastyTotal knee arthroplastyTwo-stage

Identifiers

PMID40549213
PMCPMC12185653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.