ArticleEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2026
Effectiveness of, access to and need for electroconvulsive therapy in forensic psychiatric hospitals: a survey in Germany and Switzerland.
Article in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Electroconvulsive therapy in Germany: a nationwide multilevel analysis of determinants, regional patterns, and institutional variation.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivePatients with treatment resistant schizophrenia (TRS) may benefit from electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). Although TRS is a frequent problem in forensic hospitals, ECT is rarely used in this setting. This study investigates the availability and implementation of ECT in forensic hospitals in Germany and Switzerland. Moreover, we collected anonymized clinical data of patients treated with ECT.
methodsA digital survey was sent to all forensic psychiatric hospitals in Germany and Switzerland. The questionnaire comprised general information (hospital structure, use of ECT) and an optional second part for patients treated with ECT during the last 12 months.
results41 German and 4 Suisse hospitals responded, of which the majority stated to have the possibility to offer ECT. The estimated percentage of patients with ECT indication was 7.35% (360 patients) and 7.5% (13 patients), respectively. However, only 38 patients were actually treated with ECT over a period of 12 months. Slightly over 50% of the patients were responders according to the Clinical Global Impression Improvement Scale.
conclusionOur study presents the largest population of patients with TRS treated with ECT in forensic hospitals to date. Compared to 2018, there was a marked increase in the proportion of patients for whom ECT was considered indicated. Patients treated with ECT experienced a reduction in both symptom severity and the need for restraints. The response rate aligns with matching data from non-forensic populations. In view of these promising results, prospective controlled observational studies are needed to further strengthen the evidence regarding the effectiveness of ECT in forensic populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.