SynthesisEndocrine2025
Height benefits after GnRHa treatment in girls aged over 6 years with central precocious puberty: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Endocrine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effectiveness and Safety of Hormonal Treatments in Children with Growth Disorders: A Systematic Review of Clinical Evidence.Clinics and practice · 2026Review
- Near-final adult height after GnRHa plus growth hormone in central precocious puberty: a single-center cohort study and predicted adult height validation audit.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the impact of gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog (GnRHa) treatment on height outcomes in girls aged over 6 years with central precocious puberty (CPP).
methodsA systematic search was performed across PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CNKI, and Wan Fang databases to identify eligible studies. The meta-analysis protocol was registered at PROSPERO, and the quality of the included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). A random-effects meta-analysis was used to synthesize data on height gain, final adult height (FAH), FAH standard deviation score (SDS), bone age, and the difference between FAH and target height (TH).
resultsFifteen studies including 1270 girls were identified. The results indicated that GnRHa therapy significantly improves height outcomes in girls with CPP aged over 6 years. By effectively delaying pubertal progression and bone age maturation, GnRHa treatment enables these girls to achieve a greater FAH and potentially surpass their TH. Meta-analysis showed that the GnRHa treatment group demonstrated significantly greater height gain (WMD = 2.52, 95% CI [1.66, 3.37]), FAH (WMD = (WMD = 3.18, 95% CI [1.49, 4.87]), and FAH minus TH (WMD = 0.61, 95% CI [0.42, 0.79]) compared to the control group. Additionally, bone age (WMD = -1.02, 95%CI [-1.99, -0.06]) was significantly lower than the control group. However, FAH SDS showed no significant difference between the groups (WMD = 0.09, 95%CI [-0.40, 0.58]).
conclusionsGnRHa treatment demonstrates substantial benefits in promoting height outcomes in girls over 6 years old with CPP. This meta-analysis contributes to the growing body of evidence supporting the efficacy of GnRHa in managing CPP and underscores the importance of early intervention to maximize height potential in affected individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40549140What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.