ReviewDermatology and therapy2025
A Comprehensive Narrative Review of the Challenges Surrounding Cutaneous SCC.
Review in Dermatology and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Skin in a Teenager with Fanconi Anemia: A Challenging Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Primary cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the neck mimicking tuberculous lymphadenitis.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Article
- Targeting the mPhotochemistry and photobiologyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is the second most common nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) and is predominantly found in the head and neck region. With an annual increase in NMSC diagnoses, cSCC presents significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. This review discusses the many risk factors for the development of cSCC, outlines the criteria for defining high-risk cSCC, and examines treatment approaches of these tumors based on risk stratification. While most cSCCs are treatable with surgical excision, approximately 5% metastasize, with head and neck cSCC showing poor prognosis once metastasis occurs. High-risk cSCCs, which are more likely to recur or metastasize, are often characterized by larger size, deeper invasion, and histopathological features such as perineural or vascular involvement. However, there is not a standardized definition of high-risk cSCC, leading to variability in prognosis and treatment approaches. While widely adopted staging systems such as the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th Edition (AJCC8) and the Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH) classification provide a useful framework based primarily on tumor size and extent, they have limitations-particularly in accounting for patient-specific factors. Given the complexity of factors involved in clinical decision-making, treatment recommendations warrant a case-by-case application of criteria on an individualized level, incorporating variables beyond conventional staging paradigms. While surgical excision is indicated for high-risk invasive cSCC, other treatments may include adjuvant radiation therapy (ART) and systemic therapies such as immune checkpoint inhibitors (cemiplimab, pembrolizumab, and cosibelimab) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors (cetuximab). Gene expression profiling (GEP) is a tool that offers prognostic information to help assess metastatic risk and guide treatment decisions; however, prospective, nonbiased studies are needed to validate its utility to support broader integration into clinical practice. Despite advancements, inconsistent application of ART and biopsy limitations persist, highlighting the need for a standardized, evidence-based approach to cSCC management. This review highlights the challenges surrounding cSCC and the potential value of molecular tools to improve outcomes for patients with high-risk cSCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.