ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2025
Cesium-131 collagen tile brachytherapy for salvage of recurrent intracranial metastases.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Cesium-131 brachytherapy for central nervous system salvage therapy.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
- Local control and leptomeningeal disease after resection and GammaTile brachytherapy for newly diagnosed brain metastases: results from a prospective registry.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Observational
- Intraoperative, interstitial brachytherapy in newly diagnosed brain metastases through cesium-131 collagen tile implant: A multi-institutional case series.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeManagement of brain metastases (BM) that recur after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) (rBM) is challenging. We reviewed our experience with resection with Cs-131 collagen tile brachytherapy for rBM.
methodsPatients with rBM after SRS salvaged with resection and Cs-131 brachytherapy were reviewed. Analyses included descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier for overall survival (OS), Fine and Gray modeling for subgroup comparisons, and cumulative incidence of LF (CILF).
resultsThirty-one patients (38 surgical cavities) were reviewed; primaries were most commonly breast (37%) or non-small cell lung cancer (26%). All BMs had received prior SRS to a median 20 Gy in 1 fraction at a median 12.3 months before tile implantation; disease in 32 cavities (84%) was gross totally resected. At a median patient follow-up time of 11.8 months, LF developed in 6 of 38 cavities (16%); with CILF 7.9% at 6 months and 13% at 1 year. Risk factors for LF included > 1 prior radiation courses (HR 2.44; p = 0.001), subtotal resection (HR 6.99; p = 0.015), tumor volume (HR 1.04; p = 0.006), and degree of dural contact (p < 0.001). One-year OS rate was 65.8%. Three cavities (8%) among two patients (6%) developed grade 2 + radionecrosis. Two patients developed classical leptomeningeal disease (LMD) and two patients had nodular dural seeding for an overall incidence of LMD of 12.9%.
conclusionsSalvage resection with Cs-131 collagen tile brachytherapy for rBM after SRS provides favorable local control with minimal toxicity. Lesion characteristics may help to identify patients at increased risk for LF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40549120What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.