ArticleAnnals of nuclear medicine2025
Clinical evaluation of fluorine-urethane resin-coated films for preventing and managing
Article in Annals of nuclear medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objective
methodsThe developed hydrophobic films [fluorine-coated film (F-film) and fluorine-urethane resin-coated film (FU-film)] were prepared along with a commercial hydrophobic film (Aquaglide), stainless-steel plate, sink, and urine bag were used as the test materials. Contact angles were measured using the sessile-drop method. The relationship between the contact angle of each test material (excluding the sink) and the count reduction rate after applying
resultsA strong positive correlation (r = 0.84, p = 0.001) was observed between the contact angle of the test material surface and the reduction rate of the count after wiping with a wet paper towel. Specifically, the counts of the F-film, FU-film, and Aquaglide, which had contact angles greater than 90°, decreased by 92.1%, 96.8%, and 97.4%, respectively, and the counts on the sink and the stainless-steel plate decreased by 71.9% and 69.2%, respectively. The count of the FU-film was 23.3% lower than that of the urine bag. The density of surface contamination of the FU-film after flushing was 62.2% lower than that of the toilet bowl and was lower than the background level.
conclusionThe developed FU-film effectively prevents and reduces
Indexed as
Identifiers
40549103What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.