Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40549076›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology reports2025

The monomeric but not homotrimeric spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 activates TLR4 signaling.

Charlotte Lübow, Günther Weindl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Charlotte LübowPharmaceutical Institute, Section of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Bonn, Gerhard-Domagk-Straße 3,, 53121, Bonn, Germany.
Günther WeindlPharmaceutical Institute, Section of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Bonn, Gerhard-Domagk-Straße 3,, 53121, Bonn, Germany. guenther.weindl@uni-bonn.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent findings indicate that hyperinflammatory responses to SARS-CoV-2 are major contributors to the severity and fatality of COVID-19. Pattern recognition receptors, particularly Toll-like receptors 2 (TLR2) and 4 (TLR4), have been implicated in detecting SARS-CoV-2 proteins, especially the spike protein. However, the role of viral structural components in triggering innate immune responses remains poorly understood. METHODS AND

resultsHEK293 reporter cells, engineered to stably express TLR2 or TLR4, and THP-1 differentiated macrophages were exposed to various spike protein components and SARS-CoV-2 variants. Protein levels of cytokines were detected by ELISA and mRNA expression was evaluated by quantitative real-time RT-PCR. We demonstrate that the S1 subunit and full-length spike protein elicit TLR4-dependent pro-inflammatory responses. TLR4 activation was triggered by the monomeric, but not the homotrimeric, form of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein.

conclusionsThese findings suggest that distinct elements of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein differentially activate TLR4 signaling pathways, driving innate immune and inflammatory responses.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2Spike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusToll-Like Receptor 4CytokinesHEK293 CellsHumansImmunity, InnateMacrophagesSignal TransductionTHP-1 CellsToll-Like Receptor 2CytokinesSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2TLR2 protein, humanTLR4 protein, humanToll-Like Receptor 2Toll-Like Receptor 4COVID-19 pathogenesisInnate immunityPro-inflammatory responseSARS-CoV-2 Spike proteinTLR4 signaling

Identifiers

PMID40549076
PMCPMC12185570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.