Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40549003›Full record

Trial reportOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2025

Pregnancy vitamin D supplementation and bone mineral density of the mother: a post hoc analysis of the MAVIDOS randomised placebo-controlled trial.

Rebecca J Moon, Stefania D'Angelo, Elizabeth M Curtis, Kate A Ward, Keith M Godfrey, Cyrus Cooper, Nicholas C Harvey

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rebecca J MoonMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK. rm@mrc.soton.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2334-2284
Stefania D'AngeloMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
Elizabeth M CurtisMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
Kate A WardMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
Keith M GodfreyMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
Cyrus CooperMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
Nicholas C HarveyMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_21001Medical Research Council MC_PC_21003Versus Arthritis 17702
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effect of pregnancy vitamin D supplementation on bone mineral density (BMD) in the mother immediately after delivery and at 4 years after delivery was assessed in a randomised placebo-controlled trial. The mothers' BMD did not differ between the two intervention groups. PURPOSE: Vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy has positive effects on the offspring's bone development and bone mineral density (BMD) in childhood, but there are limited data on the effects on the mother's skeleton. We assessed this in a post hoc follow-up of a randomised trial.

methodsMAVIDOS was a randomised placebo-controlled trial of 1000 IU/day cholecalciferol from 14 to 17 weeks gestation until delivery. Participants were invited to have a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan of the whole body, lumbar spine (LS) and left hip within 2 weeks after delivery and again 4 years after delivery. BMD was compared between the cholecalciferol and placebo groups; in women with DXA at both time points, the effect of cholecalciferol was assessed using mixed effects modelling to account for repeated measures.

resultsFour hundred one and 443 participants had a DXA within 2 weeks after delivery and at a mean of 4.1 years after delivery, respectively. Cholecalciferol supplementation increased serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D status in late pregnancy compared to placebo. BMD at all sites was similar between the two randomisation groups at both time points (p > 0.05 for all). Two hundred sixty-three participants had a DXA at both birth and 4 years. BMD increased between 1 and 6% depending on the site from within 2 weeks to 4 years after delivery. This was similar between randomisation groups. The pregnancy cholecalciferol had no effect on BMD at 4 years in repeated measures modelling.

conclusionsDespite previously demonstrated benefits for the offspring skeleton in this trial, maternal BMD did not differ in the short or medium term in women randomised to 1000 IU/day vitamin D or placebo.

Indexed as

Bone DensityBone Density Conservation AgentsCholecalciferolDietary SupplementsAbsorptiometry, PhotonAdultFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHip JointHumansLumbar VertebraePregnancyPrenatal CareVitamin DYoung AdultBone Density Conservation AgentsCholecalciferolVitamin DBone mineral densityCholecalciferolEpidemiologyOsteoporosisPregnancyVitamin D

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.