ArticleUrologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025
[Stones in the lower pole and their treatment].
Article in Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Health-related quality of life after thulium fiber laser lithotripsy: a prospective study according to stone localization.Scientific reports · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The most frequent initial clinical symptom is flank pain, which occurs in approximately half of affected patients with stones of the upper urinary tract. Of these patients approximately half require treatment and 50% will again have new stones in the future. Only 8% of urinary stones are clinically inapparent with 25-50% of the stones located in the lower calyx group and are incidentally discovered during the diagnostics of symptomatic stones. Stones in the lower calyx are more difficult to treat than other kidney stones due to the localization and the resulting access possibilities. The treatment must therefore be planned and carried out individually according to the available treatment options. Since the development of modern flexible ureterorenoscopes (URS) retrograde stone removal, which has few complications, has been highly valued in the treatment of stones of the lower calyx due to the desired primary stone clearance rates. Limiting factors are the longer treatment times for large stone masses and the considerable material costs. Furthermore, the various forms of percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy provide additional methods for the treatment of larger lower caliceal stones.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40549000What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.